[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":817},["ShallowReactive",2],{"/en-us/blog/how-to-configure-dast-full-scans-for-complex-web-applications":3,"navigation-en-us":38,"banner-en-us":448,"footer-en-us":458,"blog-post-authors-en-us-Dennis Appelt":700,"blog-related-posts-en-us-how-to-configure-dast-full-scans-for-complex-web-applications":714,"blog-promotions-en-us":755,"next-steps-en-us":807},{"id":4,"title":5,"authorSlugs":6,"body":8,"categorySlug":9,"config":10,"content":14,"description":8,"extension":25,"isFeatured":12,"meta":26,"navigation":27,"path":28,"publishedDate":20,"seo":29,"stem":33,"tagSlugs":34,"__hash__":37},"blogPosts/en-us/blog/how-to-configure-dast-full-scans-for-complex-web-applications.yml","How To Configure Dast Full Scans For Complex Web Applications",[7],"dennis-appelt",null,"security",{"slug":11,"featured":12,"template":13},"how-to-configure-dast-full-scans-for-complex-web-applications",false,"BlogPost",{"title":15,"description":16,"authors":17,"heroImage":19,"date":20,"body":21,"category":9,"tags":22},"How to configure DAST full scans for complex web applications","Keep your DAST job within timeout limits and fine-tune job configurations for better results",[18],"Dennis Appelt","https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1749679617/Blog/Hero%20Images/tuning-237454.jpg","2020-08-31","Shifting [Dynamic Application Security Testing](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/application_security/dast/) (DAST) left can help to detect security vulnerabilities earlier in the software development lifecycle (SDLC). However, testing earlier and more often in the SDLC comes with its own set of challenges: an abundance of alerts from automated security tools and a high computational cost caused by frequent and long-running CI security jobs.\n\nIn this blog post, I’ll walk you through how we configured DAST for the internal pipeline that tests the GitLab web application. We’ll discuss some of the common challenges that you might encounter when testing large applications, such as:\n\n1. How to keep the duration of the DAST scan within an acceptable [job timeout](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/pipelines/settings.html#timeout): This matters because jobs that exceed timeouts will fail and no results will be displayed. We will review how to optimize scan duration by excluding low-risk parts of the application from being tested, by correctly seeding your application with test data, and by parallelizing the DAST job.\n\n2. How to get relevant results for your context: This is key – tuning job configurations to produce relevant results allows your engineers to focus on findings that matter and prevents [alert fatigue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alarm_fatigue). In this area, we'll discuss criteria for identifing rules that are applicable to your application and we will explain how to disable irrelevant rules.\n\nThe discussed solutions are based on the DAST configuration that we use to test GitLab itself. If you are looking for inspiration on how to configure your own DAST jobs, feel free to take a look at our [configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/8b1557c02fe5519ba952ea59c93b84912dd357b4/.gitlab/ci/dast.gitlab-ci.yml).\n\n## How to set up a simple DAST full scan\n\nKicking off a DAST full scan in GitLab CI is as easy as including the job template and setting a few variables in your `.gitlab-ci.yml` file:\n\n```yaml\ninclude:\n  - template: DAST.gitlab-ci.yml\n\nvariables:\n  DAST_WEBSITE: \"https://my-site.example\"\n  DAST_FULL_SCAN_ENABLED: \"true\"\n  DAST_AUTH_URL: \"https://my-site.example/signin\"\n  DAST_AUTH_USERNAME: “john”\n  DAST_AUTH_PASSWORD: “P@ssw0rd”\n\n```\nThe variable `DAST_WEBSITE` defines the target website tested by DAST. Setting `DAST_FULL_SCAN_ENABLED: true` instructs DAST to run a [full scan](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/docker/full-scan/), which is more comprehensive than a [baseline scan](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/docker/baseline-scan/) and potentially finds more vulnerabilities. There are also other config options that you likely want to define such as authentication-related options (`DAST_AUTH_*`) which are not discussed here. You can check out our DAST [user docs](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/application_security/dast/#available-variables) for a refresher on these config options.\n\nWhen running a DAST full scan against a web application with many pages and input parameters, it is possible that the DAST job will not finish testing the application within the CI job timeout and fail. If this is the case for your DAST job, keep reading to learn about tweaking your job configuration to stay within the timeout.\n\n## How to optimize DAST scan duration\n\nIt is not uncommon that a DAST full scan can take 10 or more hours to complete testing in complex applications. To understand how we can reduce the scan duration, we need to take a closer look at how DAST works internally.\n\nDAST job execution is roughly separated into two phases: A spidering phase and a test execution phase. A DAST job starts with spidering, during which it will detect all pages a web application consists of and identify the input parameters on these pages. The spider recursively discovers all pages of an application by visiting the configured target URL (parameter `DAST_WEBSITE`) and by following all URLs found in the page source. These URLs are in turn also searched for URLs in their page source, any new URLs are followed and so on. In a DAST full scan, this procedure is typically repeated until all discovered URLs have been visited.\n\nIn the test execution phase, test rules are executed against the target application to find vulnerabilities. Most of the rules are executed for any of the discovered pages in the spidering phase, leading to a direct relation between the number of executed test cases and the number of discovered pages.\n\nSome rules check for specific CVEs such as [Heartbleed](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/alerts/20015/) while others are only applicable to applications written in specific languages such as [Java](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/alerts/90002/), [ASP.net](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/alerts/10061/), and so on. A DAST full scan will, by default, execute all rules even if the target application’s tech stack is not affected by the vulnerability being tested for.\n\nTo summarize, you can use the following rule of thumb to estimate a DAST job’s scan duration: Number of Tested Pages **x** Number of Executed Rules.\n\nTo optimize scan duration, we will have to tweak these factors.\n\n### How to reduce the number of tested pages\n\nTo understand which pages of our application are tested we can refer to the job log. The URLs of all tested pages are listed like in the example below.\n\n```text\n2020-08-01 00:25:34,454 The following 2903 URLs were scanned:\nGET https://gitlab-review.app\nGET https://gitlab-review.app/*/*.git\nGET https://gitlab-review.app/help\nGET https://gitlab.com/help/user/index.md\n...\n```\n\nBased on this information we can exclude low-risk pages from being tested. For example, for the GitLab web app we decided to [exclude](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/8b1557c02fe5519ba952ea59c93b84912dd357b4/.gitlab/ci/dast.gitlab-ci.yml#L30) any of the [help pages](https://gitlab.com/help). These pages are mostly static and the application code doesn’t process any user-controlled inputs, which rules out attack categories like SQL injection, XSS etc. Excluding these led to 899 URLs less being spidered and tested, reducing the scan duration significantly.\n\nTo exclude low-risk pages from being tested, you can use the environment variable [DAST_AUTH_EXCLUDE_URLS](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/application_security/dast/#available-variables) as mapped out below:\n\n```yaml\nscript:\n  - 'export DAST_AUTH_EXCLUDE_URLS=\"https://gitlab-review.app/help/.*,https://gitlab-review.app/profile/two_factor_auth\"'\n\n```\n\n`DAST_AUTH_EXCLUDE_URLS` takes a comma-separated list of URLs to exclude. URLs can contain regular expressions, e.g. `https://gitlab-review.app/help/.*` will exclude any URL that starts with `https://gitlab-review.app/help/`.\n\n### How to populate your app with test data\n\nPopulating your application with test data is important because it allows DAST to discover and test all the functionality of your application. At the same time, you want to avoid adding redundant test data to your application, which would lead to DAST exercising the same code repeatedly.\n\nFor example, we can create multiple [projects](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/) in a GitLab instance and each project will be accessible via a unique URL, e.g. `https://gitlab.example/awesome-project`, `https://gitlab.example/another-project`, etc. To DAST these look like unrelated pages and it will test each page separately. However, the application code that is processing requests to different projects is largely identical, leading to the same code being tested multiple times. This increases the scan duration and is unlikely to identify more vulnerabilities than testing only a single project would.\n\nIn every pipeline that runs DAST against GitLab, we spin up a fresh GitLab instance as a [review app](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/review_apps/) and populate it with the test data that we need for the DAST job. If you are looking for a similar solution, you might find the job that is [deploying the review app](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/8b1557c02fe5519ba952ea59c93b84912dd357b4/.gitlab/ci/review.gitlab-ci.yml#L53-83) and seeding it with [test data](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/8b1557c02fe5519ba952ea59c93b84912dd357b4/.gitlab/ci/review.gitlab-ci.yml#L83) interesting.\n\n### Identifying relevant rules for your DAST scan\n\nAs mentioned above, a DAST full scan runs, by default, all rules against any discovered page. Therefore, another way to reduce scan duration is to disable irrelevant rules or rules that you have determined are low-risk for your application context. To determine rule relevance, consider the following:\n\n- Does the rule apply to my web framework?\n- Does the rule apply to my web server?\n- Does the rule apply to my database server?\n- Does the type of vulnerability a rule tests for apply to my application?\n\nFor example, if your application is not built with Java, rules that test for [Java-specific vulnerabilities](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/alerts/90002/) can be disabled. There are many rules that are specific to a web framework, server, or database being used like [Apache HTTP Server](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/alerts/10053/), [ASP.NET](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/alerts/10061/), [PostgreSQL](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/alerts/40022/) etc. If in doubt around which rule(s) are applicable to which tech stack, you can find the information either in the [ZAP user docs](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/alerts/) or directly in the [rule implementation](https://github.com/zaproxy/zap-extensions/blob/master/addOns/ascanrules/src/main/java/org/zaproxy/zap/extension/ascanrules/CodeInjectionScanRule.java#L86-L91):\n\n```java\npublic boolean targets(TechSet technologies) {\n    if (technologies.includes(Tech.ASP) || technologies.includes(Tech.PHP)) {\n        return true;\n    }\n    return false;\n}\n```\nNote: Most rules classes have a function `targets` that defines to which technologies a rule is applicable.\n\nAnother example of a rule that might not apply to your application is the [PII Disclosure](https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/alerts/10062/) rule if your application does not process any PII.\n\n### Excluding irrelevant rules\n\nThe execution time of individual rules varies substantially. To understand how much time a particular rule adds to the total scan duration and how much we could gain from disabling it, we turn again to the job log. Each rule prints its duration on completion, for example:\n\n```text\n[zap.out] 3937350 [Thread-8] INFO org.parosproxy.paros.core.scanner.HostProcess - completed host/plugin https://gitlab-review.app | TestExternalRedirect in 2813.043s with 33151 message(s) sent and 0 alert\n```\n\nFrom this message we learn that rule `TestExternalRedirect` took 47 minutes to complete, hence disabling this rule reduces the scan duration by about 47 minutes.\n\nWe can disable individual rules with the environment variable `DAST_EXCLUDE_RULES`. Here is an example:\n\n```yaml\nvariables:\n  DAST_EXCLUDE_RULES=”41,42,43,10027,...,90019”\n\n```\n\n`DAST_EXCLUDE_RULES` takes a comma-separated list of rule ids. You can find the id of a particular rule in the summary printed to the job log:\n\n```text\nPASS: External Redirect [20019]\n…\nSUMMARY - PASS: 106 | WARN: 2\n```\n\nWe can see from the log that rule External Redirect, which we found earlier to take 47 minutes, has rule id 20019. To disable this rule in addition to the rules from the previous example, we would need to add it to `DAST_EXCLUDE_RULES` like so:\n\n```yaml\nvariables:\n  DAST_EXCLUDE_RULES=”20019,41,42,43,10027,...,90019”\n\n```\n### Parallelizing DAST jobs to further reduce pipeline duration\n\nTo reduce the total duration of the pipeline that is running the DAST job, we can split up the rules that we want to execute into multiple DAST jobs and run the jobs in parallel. Below is an example that demonstrates how to split up the rules.\n\n```yaml\n# Any configuration that is shared between jobs goes here\n.dast-conf:\n  image:\n    name: \"registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/dast:1.22.1\"\n  services:\n  - name: \"gitlab/gitlab-ee:nightly\"\n    alias: gitlab\n  script:\n  - /analyze -t \"http://gitlab\"\n\n# First DAST job executing rules 6 to 10\ndast-1/2:\n  extends:\n  - .dast-conf\n  variables:\n    DAST_EXCLUDE_RULES: \"1,2,3,4,5\"\n\n# Second DAST job executing rules 1 to 5\ndast-2/2:\n  extends:\n  - .dast-conf\n  variables:\n    DAST_EXCLUDE_RULES: \"5,6,7,8,9\"\n\n```\n\nFor the sake of brevity, we assume in the example above that our DAST job runs rules with id 1 to 10. As described in the previous section, refer to the job log to find which rules were executed (we are working on printing a tidy [summary of executed rules](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/230893)). The example defines two DAST jobs `dast-1/2` and `dast-2/2`. `dast-1/2` is excluding rules 1 to 5 and, hence, executes rules 6 to 10. Vice versa, `dast-2/2` is excluding rules 6 to 10 and, hence, executes rules 1 to 5.\n\nFollowing the same pattern, you can split up the rules into as many jobs as necessary, keeping the rules executed in a job mutually exclusive with respect to all other jobs.\n\nNote that new releases of GitLab DAST may contain new rules, which will get executed if the rule ids are not manually added to `DAST_EXCLUDE_RULES`. In the example above, we pinned the version of the DAST image to a specific version using the `image` keyword. This allows us to review new releases manually and adjust `DAST_EXCLUDE_RULES` as necessary before upgrading to a new DAST version.\n\nWhen running multiple DAST jobs in parallel against the same target application, make sure that the application isn’t overloaded and becomes a bottleneck. If you observe connection timeouts in the DAST job logs, chances are your target site is overloaded. To mitigate this issue, consider spinning up additional instances of your target application and distribute the test load among the instances. GitLab CI offers, through the [`services`](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/docker/using_docker_images.html#what-is-a-service) keyword, a convenient way of creating a dedicated application instance for each DAST job. In the example above, we start a dedicated GitLab instance for each DAST job with:\n\n```yaml\n\n  services:\n  - name: \"gitlab/gitlab-ee:nightly\"\n    alias: gitlab\n\n```\n## Summary\n\nIn this blog post, we walked you through common challenges encountered when testing complex web applications with DAST and solutions that worked well for our internal projects at GitLab.\n\nAs we continue and broaden our use of DAST full scans within GitLab and our Security department, we’re excited to identify vulnerabilities in GitLab earlier in the SDLC and look forward to sharing interesting findings with the community. In addition, we take our lessons learned from setting up DAST full scans back to our engineering team to continue improving user experience. We also plan to explore additional dynamic testing techniques such as [fuzzing](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/application_security/coverage_fuzzing/) to complement our DAST results.\n\nIs there a problem area that you’ve encountered or solution for fine-tuning DAST full scans we've missed that's worked well for you? We want to hear about it and would love your feedback below in the comments.\n\nCover image by [Pixabay](https://www.pexels.com/@pixabay) on [Pexels](https://www.pexels.com/photo/blur-bowed-stringed-instrument-classic-classical-237454/)\n",[9,23,24],"security research","open source","yml",{},true,"/en-us/blog/how-to-configure-dast-full-scans-for-complex-web-applications",{"title":15,"description":16,"ogTitle":15,"ogDescription":16,"noIndex":12,"ogImage":19,"ogUrl":30,"ogSiteName":31,"ogType":32,"canonicalUrls":30},"https://about.gitlab.com/blog/how-to-configure-dast-full-scans-for-complex-web-applications","https://about.gitlab.com","article","en-us/blog/how-to-configure-dast-full-scans-for-complex-web-applications",[9,35,36],"security-research","open-source","Oisr0EJTGNNL7s4-bNmqJlhe48GvZJpC5Y_UYwl3aPE",{"data":39},{"logo":40,"freeTrial":45,"sales":50,"login":55,"items":60,"search":368,"minimal":399,"duo":418,"switchNav":427,"pricingDeployment":438},{"config":41},{"href":42,"dataGaName":43,"dataGaLocation":44},"/","gitlab logo","header",{"text":46,"config":47},"Get free trial",{"href":48,"dataGaName":49,"dataGaLocation":44},"https://gitlab.com/-/trial_registrations/new?glm_source=about.gitlab.com&glm_content=default-saas-trial/","free trial",{"text":51,"config":52},"Talk to sales",{"href":53,"dataGaName":54,"dataGaLocation":44},"/sales/","sales",{"text":56,"config":57},"Sign in",{"href":58,"dataGaName":59,"dataGaLocation":44},"https://gitlab.com/users/sign_in/","sign in",[61,88,183,188,289,349],{"text":62,"config":63,"cards":65},"Platform",{"dataNavLevelOne":64},"platform",[66,72,80],{"title":62,"description":67,"link":68},"The intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps",{"text":69,"config":70},"Explore our Platform",{"href":71,"dataGaName":64,"dataGaLocation":44},"/platform/",{"title":73,"description":74,"link":75},"GitLab Duo Agent Platform","Agentic AI for the entire software lifecycle",{"text":76,"config":77},"Meet GitLab Duo",{"href":78,"dataGaName":79,"dataGaLocation":44},"/gitlab-duo-agent-platform/","gitlab duo agent platform",{"title":81,"description":82,"link":83},"Why GitLab","See the top reasons enterprises choose GitLab",{"text":84,"config":85},"Learn more",{"href":86,"dataGaName":87,"dataGaLocation":44},"/why-gitlab/","why gitlab",{"text":89,"left":27,"config":90,"link":92,"lists":96,"footer":165},"Product",{"dataNavLevelOne":91},"solutions",{"text":93,"config":94},"View all Solutions",{"href":95,"dataGaName":91,"dataGaLocation":44},"/solutions/",[97,121,144],{"title":98,"description":99,"link":100,"items":105},"Automation","CI/CD and automation to accelerate deployment",{"config":101},{"icon":102,"href":103,"dataGaName":104,"dataGaLocation":44},"AutomatedCodeAlt","/solutions/delivery-automation/","automated software delivery",[106,110,113,117],{"text":107,"config":108},"CI/CD",{"href":109,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":107},"/solutions/continuous-integration/",{"text":73,"config":111},{"href":78,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":112},"gitlab duo agent platform - product menu",{"text":114,"config":115},"Source Code Management",{"href":116,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":114},"/solutions/source-code-management/",{"text":118,"config":119},"Automated Software Delivery",{"href":103,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":120},"Automated software delivery",{"title":122,"description":123,"link":124,"items":129},"Security","Deliver code faster without compromising security",{"config":125},{"href":126,"dataGaName":127,"dataGaLocation":44,"icon":128},"/solutions/application-security-testing/","security and compliance","ShieldCheckLight",[130,134,139],{"text":131,"config":132},"Application Security Testing",{"href":126,"dataGaName":133,"dataGaLocation":44},"Application security testing",{"text":135,"config":136},"Software Supply Chain Security",{"href":137,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":138},"/solutions/supply-chain/","Software supply chain security",{"text":140,"config":141},"Software Compliance",{"href":142,"dataGaName":143,"dataGaLocation":44},"/solutions/software-compliance/","software compliance",{"title":145,"link":146,"items":151},"Measurement",{"config":147},{"icon":148,"href":149,"dataGaName":150,"dataGaLocation":44},"DigitalTransformation","/solutions/visibility-measurement/","visibility and measurement",[152,156,160],{"text":153,"config":154},"Visibility & Measurement",{"href":149,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":155},"Visibility and Measurement",{"text":157,"config":158},"Value Stream Management",{"href":159,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":157},"/solutions/value-stream-management/",{"text":161,"config":162},"Analytics & Insights",{"href":163,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":164},"/solutions/analytics-and-insights/","Analytics and insights",{"title":166,"items":167},"GitLab for",[168,173,178],{"text":169,"config":170},"Enterprise",{"href":171,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":172},"/enterprise/","enterprise",{"text":174,"config":175},"Small Business",{"href":176,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":177},"/small-business/","small business",{"text":179,"config":180},"Public Sector",{"href":181,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":182},"/solutions/public-sector/","public sector",{"text":184,"config":185},"Pricing",{"href":186,"dataGaName":187,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataNavLevelOne":187},"/pricing/","pricing",{"text":189,"config":190,"link":192,"lists":196,"feature":276},"Resources",{"dataNavLevelOne":191},"resources",{"text":193,"config":194},"View all resources",{"href":195,"dataGaName":191,"dataGaLocation":44},"/resources/",[197,230,248],{"title":198,"items":199},"Getting started",[200,205,210,215,220,225],{"text":201,"config":202},"Install",{"href":203,"dataGaName":204,"dataGaLocation":44},"/install/","install",{"text":206,"config":207},"Quick start guides",{"href":208,"dataGaName":209,"dataGaLocation":44},"/get-started/","quick setup checklists",{"text":211,"config":212},"Learn",{"href":213,"dataGaLocation":44,"dataGaName":214},"https://university.gitlab.com/","learn",{"text":216,"config":217},"Product documentation",{"href":218,"dataGaName":219,"dataGaLocation":44},"https://docs.gitlab.com/","product documentation",{"text":221,"config":222},"Best practice videos",{"href":223,"dataGaName":224,"dataGaLocation":44},"/getting-started-videos/","best practice videos",{"text":226,"config":227},"Integrations",{"href":228,"dataGaName":229,"dataGaLocation":44},"/integrations/","integrations",{"title":231,"items":232},"Discover",[233,238,243],{"text":234,"config":235},"Customer success stories",{"href":236,"dataGaName":237,"dataGaLocation":44},"/customers/","customer success stories",{"text":239,"config":240},"Blog",{"href":241,"dataGaName":242,"dataGaLocation":44},"/blog/","blog",{"text":244,"config":245},"Remote",{"href":246,"dataGaName":247,"dataGaLocation":44},"https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/company/culture/all-remote/","remote",{"title":249,"items":250},"Connect",[251,256,261,266,271],{"text":252,"config":253},"GitLab Services",{"href":254,"dataGaName":255,"dataGaLocation":44},"/services/","services",{"text":257,"config":258},"Community",{"href":259,"dataGaName":260,"dataGaLocation":44},"/community/","community",{"text":262,"config":263},"Forum",{"href":264,"dataGaName":265,"dataGaLocation":44},"https://forum.gitlab.com/","forum",{"text":267,"config":268},"Events",{"href":269,"dataGaName":270,"dataGaLocation":44},"/events/","events",{"text":272,"config":273},"Partners",{"href":274,"dataGaName":275,"dataGaLocation":44},"/partners/","partners",{"backgroundColor":277,"textColor":278,"text":279,"image":280,"link":284},"#2f2a6b","#fff","Insights for the future of software development",{"altText":281,"config":282},"the source promo card",{"src":283},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1758208064/dzl0dbift9xdizyelkk4.svg",{"text":285,"config":286},"Read the latest",{"href":287,"dataGaName":288,"dataGaLocation":44},"/the-source/","the source",{"text":290,"config":291,"lists":293},"Company",{"dataNavLevelOne":292},"company",[294],{"items":295},[296,301,307,309,314,319,324,329,334,339,344],{"text":297,"config":298},"About",{"href":299,"dataGaName":300,"dataGaLocation":44},"/company/","about",{"text":302,"config":303,"footerGa":306},"Jobs",{"href":304,"dataGaName":305,"dataGaLocation":44},"/jobs/","jobs",{"dataGaName":305},{"text":267,"config":308},{"href":269,"dataGaName":270,"dataGaLocation":44},{"text":310,"config":311},"Leadership",{"href":312,"dataGaName":313,"dataGaLocation":44},"/company/team/e-group/","leadership",{"text":315,"config":316},"Team",{"href":317,"dataGaName":318,"dataGaLocation":44},"/company/team/","team",{"text":320,"config":321},"Handbook",{"href":322,"dataGaName":323,"dataGaLocation":44},"https://handbook.gitlab.com/","handbook",{"text":325,"config":326},"Investor relations",{"href":327,"dataGaName":328,"dataGaLocation":44},"https://ir.gitlab.com/","investor relations",{"text":330,"config":331},"Trust Center",{"href":332,"dataGaName":333,"dataGaLocation":44},"/security/","trust center",{"text":335,"config":336},"AI Transparency Center",{"href":337,"dataGaName":338,"dataGaLocation":44},"/ai-transparency-center/","ai transparency center",{"text":340,"config":341},"Newsletter",{"href":342,"dataGaName":343,"dataGaLocation":44},"/company/contact/#contact-forms","newsletter",{"text":345,"config":346},"Press",{"href":347,"dataGaName":348,"dataGaLocation":44},"/press/","press",{"text":350,"config":351,"lists":352},"Contact us",{"dataNavLevelOne":292},[353],{"items":354},[355,358,363],{"text":51,"config":356},{"href":53,"dataGaName":357,"dataGaLocation":44},"talk to sales",{"text":359,"config":360},"Support portal",{"href":361,"dataGaName":362,"dataGaLocation":44},"https://support.gitlab.com","support portal",{"text":364,"config":365},"Customer portal",{"href":366,"dataGaName":367,"dataGaLocation":44},"https://customers.gitlab.com/customers/sign_in/","customer portal",{"close":369,"login":370,"suggestions":377},"Close",{"text":371,"link":372},"To search repositories and projects, login to",{"text":373,"config":374},"gitlab.com",{"href":58,"dataGaName":375,"dataGaLocation":376},"search login","search",{"text":378,"default":379},"Suggestions",[380,382,386,388,392,396],{"text":73,"config":381},{"href":78,"dataGaName":73,"dataGaLocation":376},{"text":383,"config":384},"Code Suggestions (AI)",{"href":385,"dataGaName":383,"dataGaLocation":376},"/solutions/code-suggestions/",{"text":107,"config":387},{"href":109,"dataGaName":107,"dataGaLocation":376},{"text":389,"config":390},"GitLab on AWS",{"href":391,"dataGaName":389,"dataGaLocation":376},"/partners/technology-partners/aws/",{"text":393,"config":394},"GitLab on Google Cloud",{"href":395,"dataGaName":393,"dataGaLocation":376},"/partners/technology-partners/google-cloud-platform/",{"text":397,"config":398},"Why GitLab?",{"href":86,"dataGaName":397,"dataGaLocation":376},{"freeTrial":400,"mobileIcon":405,"desktopIcon":410,"secondaryButton":413},{"text":401,"config":402},"Start free trial",{"href":403,"dataGaName":49,"dataGaLocation":404},"https://gitlab.com/-/trials/new/","nav",{"altText":406,"config":407},"Gitlab Icon",{"src":408,"dataGaName":409,"dataGaLocation":404},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1758203874/jypbw1jx72aexsoohd7x.svg","gitlab icon",{"altText":406,"config":411},{"src":412,"dataGaName":409,"dataGaLocation":404},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1758203875/gs4c8p8opsgvflgkswz9.svg",{"text":414,"config":415},"Get Started",{"href":416,"dataGaName":417,"dataGaLocation":404},"https://gitlab.com/-/trial_registrations/new?glm_source=about.gitlab.com/get-started/","get started",{"freeTrial":419,"mobileIcon":423,"desktopIcon":425},{"text":420,"config":421},"Learn more about GitLab Duo",{"href":78,"dataGaName":422,"dataGaLocation":404},"gitlab duo",{"altText":406,"config":424},{"src":408,"dataGaName":409,"dataGaLocation":404},{"altText":406,"config":426},{"src":412,"dataGaName":409,"dataGaLocation":404},{"button":428,"mobileIcon":433,"desktopIcon":435},{"text":429,"config":430},"/switch",{"href":431,"dataGaName":432,"dataGaLocation":404},"#contact","switch",{"altText":406,"config":434},{"src":408,"dataGaName":409,"dataGaLocation":404},{"altText":406,"config":436},{"src":437,"dataGaName":409,"dataGaLocation":404},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1773335277/ohhpiuoxoldryzrnhfrh.png",{"freeTrial":439,"mobileIcon":444,"desktopIcon":446},{"text":440,"config":441},"Back to pricing",{"href":186,"dataGaName":442,"dataGaLocation":404,"icon":443},"back to pricing","GoBack",{"altText":406,"config":445},{"src":408,"dataGaName":409,"dataGaLocation":404},{"altText":406,"config":447},{"src":412,"dataGaName":409,"dataGaLocation":404},{"title":449,"button":450,"config":455},"See how agentic AI transforms software delivery",{"text":451,"config":452},"Watch GitLab Transcend now",{"href":453,"dataGaName":454,"dataGaLocation":44},"/events/transcend/virtual/","transcend event",{"layout":456,"icon":457,"disabled":27},"release","AiStar",{"data":459},{"text":460,"source":461,"edit":467,"contribute":472,"config":477,"items":482,"minimal":689},"Git is a trademark of Software Freedom Conservancy and our use of 'GitLab' is under license",{"text":462,"config":463},"View page source",{"href":464,"dataGaName":465,"dataGaLocation":466},"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/digital-experience/about-gitlab-com/","page source","footer",{"text":468,"config":469},"Edit this page",{"href":470,"dataGaName":471,"dataGaLocation":466},"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/digital-experience/about-gitlab-com/-/blob/main/content/","web ide",{"text":473,"config":474},"Please contribute",{"href":475,"dataGaName":476,"dataGaLocation":466},"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/digital-experience/about-gitlab-com/-/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/","please contribute",{"twitter":478,"facebook":479,"youtube":480,"linkedin":481},"https://twitter.com/gitlab","https://www.facebook.com/gitlab","https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnMGQ8QHMAnVIsI3xJrihhg","https://www.linkedin.com/company/gitlab-com",[483,530,584,628,655],{"title":184,"links":484,"subMenu":499},[485,489,494],{"text":486,"config":487},"View plans",{"href":186,"dataGaName":488,"dataGaLocation":466},"view plans",{"text":490,"config":491},"Why Premium?",{"href":492,"dataGaName":493,"dataGaLocation":466},"/pricing/premium/","why premium",{"text":495,"config":496},"Why Ultimate?",{"href":497,"dataGaName":498,"dataGaLocation":466},"/pricing/ultimate/","why ultimate",[500],{"title":501,"links":502},"Contact Us",[503,506,508,510,515,520,525],{"text":504,"config":505},"Contact sales",{"href":53,"dataGaName":54,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":359,"config":507},{"href":361,"dataGaName":362,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":364,"config":509},{"href":366,"dataGaName":367,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":511,"config":512},"Status",{"href":513,"dataGaName":514,"dataGaLocation":466},"https://status.gitlab.com/","status",{"text":516,"config":517},"Terms of use",{"href":518,"dataGaName":519,"dataGaLocation":466},"/terms/","terms of use",{"text":521,"config":522},"Privacy statement",{"href":523,"dataGaName":524,"dataGaLocation":466},"/privacy/","privacy statement",{"text":526,"config":527},"Cookie preferences",{"dataGaName":528,"dataGaLocation":466,"id":529,"isOneTrustButton":27},"cookie preferences","ot-sdk-btn",{"title":89,"links":531,"subMenu":540},[532,536],{"text":533,"config":534},"DevSecOps platform",{"href":71,"dataGaName":535,"dataGaLocation":466},"devsecops platform",{"text":537,"config":538},"AI-Assisted Development",{"href":78,"dataGaName":539,"dataGaLocation":466},"ai-assisted development",[541],{"title":542,"links":543},"Topics",[544,549,554,559,564,569,574,579],{"text":545,"config":546},"CICD",{"href":547,"dataGaName":548,"dataGaLocation":466},"/topics/ci-cd/","cicd",{"text":550,"config":551},"GitOps",{"href":552,"dataGaName":553,"dataGaLocation":466},"/topics/gitops/","gitops",{"text":555,"config":556},"DevOps",{"href":557,"dataGaName":558,"dataGaLocation":466},"/topics/devops/","devops",{"text":560,"config":561},"Version Control",{"href":562,"dataGaName":563,"dataGaLocation":466},"/topics/version-control/","version control",{"text":565,"config":566},"DevSecOps",{"href":567,"dataGaName":568,"dataGaLocation":466},"/topics/devsecops/","devsecops",{"text":570,"config":571},"Cloud Native",{"href":572,"dataGaName":573,"dataGaLocation":466},"/topics/cloud-native/","cloud native",{"text":575,"config":576},"AI for Coding",{"href":577,"dataGaName":578,"dataGaLocation":466},"/topics/devops/ai-for-coding/","ai for coding",{"text":580,"config":581},"Agentic AI",{"href":582,"dataGaName":583,"dataGaLocation":466},"/topics/agentic-ai/","agentic ai",{"title":585,"links":586},"Solutions",[587,589,591,596,600,603,607,610,612,615,618,623],{"text":131,"config":588},{"href":126,"dataGaName":131,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":120,"config":590},{"href":103,"dataGaName":104,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":592,"config":593},"Agile development",{"href":594,"dataGaName":595,"dataGaLocation":466},"/solutions/agile-delivery/","agile delivery",{"text":597,"config":598},"SCM",{"href":116,"dataGaName":599,"dataGaLocation":466},"source code management",{"text":545,"config":601},{"href":109,"dataGaName":602,"dataGaLocation":466},"continuous integration & delivery",{"text":604,"config":605},"Value stream management",{"href":159,"dataGaName":606,"dataGaLocation":466},"value stream management",{"text":550,"config":608},{"href":609,"dataGaName":553,"dataGaLocation":466},"/solutions/gitops/",{"text":169,"config":611},{"href":171,"dataGaName":172,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":613,"config":614},"Small business",{"href":176,"dataGaName":177,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":616,"config":617},"Public sector",{"href":181,"dataGaName":182,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":619,"config":620},"Education",{"href":621,"dataGaName":622,"dataGaLocation":466},"/solutions/education/","education",{"text":624,"config":625},"Financial services",{"href":626,"dataGaName":627,"dataGaLocation":466},"/solutions/finance/","financial services",{"title":189,"links":629},[630,632,634,636,639,641,643,645,647,649,651,653],{"text":201,"config":631},{"href":203,"dataGaName":204,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":206,"config":633},{"href":208,"dataGaName":209,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":211,"config":635},{"href":213,"dataGaName":214,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":216,"config":637},{"href":218,"dataGaName":638,"dataGaLocation":466},"docs",{"text":239,"config":640},{"href":241,"dataGaName":242,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":234,"config":642},{"href":236,"dataGaName":237,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":244,"config":644},{"href":246,"dataGaName":247,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":252,"config":646},{"href":254,"dataGaName":255,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":257,"config":648},{"href":259,"dataGaName":260,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":262,"config":650},{"href":264,"dataGaName":265,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":267,"config":652},{"href":269,"dataGaName":270,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":272,"config":654},{"href":274,"dataGaName":275,"dataGaLocation":466},{"title":290,"links":656},[657,659,661,663,665,667,669,673,678,680,682,684],{"text":297,"config":658},{"href":299,"dataGaName":292,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":302,"config":660},{"href":304,"dataGaName":305,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":310,"config":662},{"href":312,"dataGaName":313,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":315,"config":664},{"href":317,"dataGaName":318,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":320,"config":666},{"href":322,"dataGaName":323,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":325,"config":668},{"href":327,"dataGaName":328,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":670,"config":671},"Sustainability",{"href":672,"dataGaName":670,"dataGaLocation":466},"/sustainability/",{"text":674,"config":675},"Diversity, inclusion and belonging (DIB)",{"href":676,"dataGaName":677,"dataGaLocation":466},"/diversity-inclusion-belonging/","Diversity, inclusion and belonging",{"text":330,"config":679},{"href":332,"dataGaName":333,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":340,"config":681},{"href":342,"dataGaName":343,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":345,"config":683},{"href":347,"dataGaName":348,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":685,"config":686},"Modern Slavery Transparency Statement",{"href":687,"dataGaName":688,"dataGaLocation":466},"https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/legal/modern-slavery-act-transparency-statement/","modern slavery transparency statement",{"items":690},[691,694,697],{"text":692,"config":693},"Terms",{"href":518,"dataGaName":519,"dataGaLocation":466},{"text":695,"config":696},"Cookies",{"dataGaName":528,"dataGaLocation":466,"id":529,"isOneTrustButton":27},{"text":698,"config":699},"Privacy",{"href":523,"dataGaName":524,"dataGaLocation":466},[701],{"id":702,"title":18,"body":8,"config":703,"content":705,"description":8,"extension":25,"meta":709,"navigation":27,"path":710,"seo":711,"stem":712,"__hash__":713},"blogAuthors/en-us/blog/authors/dennis-appelt.yml",{"template":704},"BlogAuthor",{"name":18,"config":706},{"headshot":707,"ctfId":708},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1749672032/Blog/Author%20Headshots/dappelt-headshot.jpg","dappelt",{},"/en-us/blog/authors/dennis-appelt",{},"en-us/blog/authors/dennis-appelt","s0eKcsSwHvpcru4Dk7IkXJyRfuBEWrMhfVAJ_Fan-L4",[715,728,743],{"content":716,"config":726},{"title":717,"description":718,"authors":719,"date":721,"body":722,"category":9,"tags":723,"heroImage":725},"Prepare your pipeline for AI-discovered zero-days","AI is finding vulnerabilities faster than teams can patch. Learn how pipeline enforcement, automated triage, and AI remediation close the gap.",[720],"Omer Azaria","2026-04-20","Anthropic's [Mythos Preview model](https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/) recently identified thousands of zero-day vulnerabilities across every major operating system and web browser, including an OpenBSD bug that went undetected for 27 years. In testing, Mythos autonomously chained four vulnerabilities into a working browser exploit that escaped its sandbox. Anthropic is restricting access to Mythos, but the company’s head of offensive cyber research expects threats to have comparable tooling within six to twelve months.\n\nThe defender side of the equation hasn't kept pace. One third of exploited Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) in the first half of 2025 showed activity on or before disclosure day, before most teams even know there's something to patch. AI is compressing that window further, accelerating attackers and flooding teams with whitehat disclosures faster than they can triage. Defender tooling has improved, but most organizations can't operationalize it fast enough to close the gap between discovery and exploitation.\n\nWhen the window between disclosure and exploitation is measured in hours, the security team can't be the last line of defense. Security has to run where code enters the system: in the pipeline, on every merge request, enforced by policy. The fixes that can be automated should be. The ones that can't need to reach the right human faster than they do today.\n\n## Known vulnerabilities are already outpacing remediation\n\nThe bottleneck isn't detection, it's acting at scale on what teams already know. Sixty percent of breaches in the 2025 Verizon DBIR involved exploiting known vulnerabilities where a patch was already available. Teams couldn’t close them in time.\n\nThe backlog was untenable before Mythos. Developers spend [11 hours per month remediating vulnerabilities](https://about.gitlab.com/resources/developer-survey/) post-release instead of shipping new work. Over half of organizations have at least one open internet-facing vulnerability, and the median time to close half of those is 361 days. Exploitation takes hours, while remediation takes months.\n\nAI-assisted development is widening the gap, and stakeholders know it. By June 2025, AI-generated code was adding over 10,000 new security findings per month across Fortune 50 repositories, a 10x jump from six months earlier. Georgia Tech identified 34 [CVEs attributable to AI-generated code](https://research.gatech.edu/bad-vibes-ai-generated-code-vulnerable-researchers-warn) in March 2026, up from 6 in January, and that count reflects only the ones where AI authorship is clear. AI coding assistants hallucinate package names, reach for outdated patterns, and copy insecure examples from training data. More code, more dependencies, and more vulnerabilities per line are generated faster than security teams can review them.\n\nDefenders need to harness frontier AI models, too — not bolted onto the SDLC as external tooling, but running inside the same policies, approvals, and audit trail as the rest of the team. \n\n## Security at the speed of AI coding\n\nWhen a critical CVE drops, how quickly can your team confirm which projects are affected? How many tools does an alert cross before a developer can submit a fix?\n\nThe teams that benefit most from AI already have policies, enforcement, and controls embedded in their development workflows. AI amplifies that foundation. It doesn't replace it.\n\n**Enforcement at the point of change.** As exploitation windows compress, every line of code entering a repository needs to pass through a defined set of controls. Not a separate review, in a different tool, by a different team. Organizations need the ability to enforce security policies across every group and project, with the merge request as the enforcement point. Policies defined once, applied everywhere, with exceptions reviewed, approved, and logged.\n\n**Simple issues caught before the merge request, not during.** Hardcoded secrets, known-vulnerable imports, and deprecated API calls can be flagged in the IDE before a developer pushes a commit. Catching them at authoring time means fewer findings blocking the MR, so review cycles go to the findings that require cross-component context: reachability, exploitability, and architectural risk.\n\n**Triage automated by default, not by exception.** Embedding security into every merge request creates a volume problem. More scans, more findings, more noise reaching developers who aren’t trained to distinguish a reachable critical from a theoretical one. AI must handle false positive detection, reachability, exploitability context, and severity assessment before a developer sees the finding, so the findings they see actually warrant their time.\n\n**Remediation governed like any other change.** AI-based remediation compresses the timeline for closing vulnerabilities, but every generated fix must move through the same governance as a human-authored change: policies enforce scans, the right reviewers approve, and evidence is recorded. GitLab’s automated remediation capability proposes each fix in a merge request with a confidence score. The MR records which policy applied, which scans ran, what they found, and who approved. Human code and AI-generated code move through the same process, with the same audit trail.\n\n## What a ready pipeline looks like\n\nHere's how these pieces work together when a high-severity vulnerability is discovered and the clock is running.\n\nA proof-of-concept exploit for a vulnerability in a popular open-source package appears on a security mailing list. There’s no CVE, no National Vulnerability Database (NVD) entry, and no scanner signature yet. The security team finds out the usual way: someone shares it in Slack.\n\nA security engineer asks the security agent if the package is in use, which projects have affected versions, and whether any vulnerable call paths are reachable in production. The agent checks the dependency graph for every project, matches the affected versions and entry points from the disclosure, and returns a ranked list of exposed projects with details about reachability. There’s no need to search through repositories by hand or wait for a scanner update. The question, \"Are we exposed?\" is answered in minutes.\n\nThe engineer starts a remediation campaign for every exposed project. The remediation agent suggests fixes: version updates where a patched release is available, and targeted call-path patches where it is not. Scan execution policies are already in place for projects tagged SOC 2. The engineer hardens the rules to block merges on any merge request that introduces or keeps the affected dependency, and an approval policy now requires security sign-off on every fix. The agent's first proposed patch fails the pipeline when an integration test catches a regression. The agent revises the patch based on the test failure, and the second attempt passes. Developers review the changes, security signs off under the stricter policy, and merges proceed across the campaign.\n\nAt the next audit review, the security team presents a report showing how policies were enforced and risks were reduced during the campaign. It includes scan results, policies applied, approvers, and merge timestamps for every MR in every affected project. The evidence was automatically generated in flight, not assembled after the fact.\n\n## Close the gaps now\n\nMythos exists today, and comparable models will be in attacker hands within a year. Every month between now and then is a chance to strengthen your software supply chain.\n\nAsk these questions about your pipeline:\n\n* How do you enforce that security scans run on every merge request, not just the projects where teams configured them?\n\n* If a compromised package entered your dependency tree today, would your pipeline catch it before build?\n\n* When a scanner flags a critical finding, how many tool boundaries does it cross before a developer starts the fix?\n\n* If an AI agent proposed a code fix for a vulnerability, what process would that fix go through before reaching production, and is that process auditable?\n\n* When auditors ask for evidence that a specific policy was enforced on a specific change, how long does it take to produce?\n\nIf the answers expose gaps, address them now. [Talk to a GitLab solutions architect](https://about.gitlab.com/sales/) about the role of security governance in your development lifecycle.",[724,9,533],"AI/ML","https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1772195014/ooezwusxjl1f7ijfmbvj.png",{"featured":27,"template":13,"slug":727},"prepare-your-pipeline-for-ai-discovered-zero-days",{"content":729,"config":741},{"title":730,"description":731,"authors":732,"heroImage":734,"date":735,"category":9,"tags":736,"body":740},"Manage vulnerability noise at scale with auto-dismiss policies","Learn how to cut through scanner noise and focus on the vulnerabilities that matter most with GitLab security, including use cases and templates.",[733],"Grant Hickman","https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1774375772/kpaaaiqhokevxxeoxvu0.png","2026-03-25",[9,737,565,738,739],"tutorial","features","product","Security scanners are essential, but not every finding requires action. Test code, vendored dependencies, generated files, and known false positives create noise that buries the vulnerabilities that actually matter. Security teams waste hours manually dismissing the same irrelevant findings across projects and pipelines. They experience slower triage, alert fatigue, and developer friction that undermines adoption of security scanning itself.\n\nGitLab's auto-dismiss vulnerability policies let you codify your triage decisions once and apply them automatically on every default-branch pipeline. Define criteria based on file path, directory, or vulnerability identifier (CVE, CWE), choose a dismissal reason, and let GitLab handle the rest.\n\n## Why auto-dismiss?\nAuto-dismiss vulnerability policies enable security teams to:\n- **Eliminate triage noise**: Automatically dismiss findings in test code, vendored dependencies, and generated files.\n- **Enforce decisions at scale**: Apply policies centrally to dismiss known false positives across your entire organization.\n- **Maintain audit transparency**: Every auto-dismissed finding includes a documented reason and links back to the policy that triggered it.\n- **Preserve the record**: Unlike scanner exclusions, dismissed vulnerabilities remain in your report, so you can revisit decisions if conditions change.\n\n## How auto-dismiss policies work\n\n1. **Define your policy** in a vulnerability management policy YAML file. Specify match criteria (file path, directory, or identifier) and a dismissal reason.\n\n2. **Merge and activate.** Create the policy via **Secure > Policies > New  policy > Vulnerability management policy**. Merge the MR to enable it.\n3. **Run your pipeline.** On every default-branch pipeline, matching vulnerabilities are automatically set to \"Dismissed\" with the specified reason. Up to 1,000 vulnerabilities are processed per run.\n4. **Measure the impact.** Filter your vulnerability report by status \"Dismissed\" to see exactly what was cleaned up and validate that the right findings are being handled.\n\n## Use cases with ready-to-use configurations\n\nEach example below includes a policy configuration you can copy, customize, and apply immediately.\n\n### 1. Dismiss test code vulnerabilities\n\nSAST and dependency scanners flag hardcoded credentials, insecure fixtures, and dev-only dependencies in test directories. These are not production risks.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Dismiss test code vulnerabilities\"\n    description: \"Auto-dismiss findings in test directories\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: file_path\n            value: \"test/**/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: file_path\n            value: \"tests/**/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: file_path\n            value: \"spec/**/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: directory\n            value: \"__tests__/*\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: used_in_tests\n\n```\n\n### 2. Dismiss vendored and third-party code\n\nVulnerabilities in `vendor/`, `third_party/`, or checked-in `node_modules` are managed upstream and not actionable for your team.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Dismiss vendored dependency findings\"\n    description: \"Findings in vendored code are managed upstream\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: directory\n            value: \"vendor/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: directory\n            value: \"third_party/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: directory\n            value: \"vendored/*\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: not_applicable\n\n```\n\n### 3. Dismiss known false positive CVEs\n\nCertain CVEs are repeatedly flagged but don't apply to your usage context. Teams dismiss these manually every time they appear. Replace the example CVEs below with your own.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Dismiss known false positive CVEs\"\n    description: \"CVEs confirmed as false positives for our environment\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CVE-2023-44487\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CVE-2024-29041\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CVE-2023-26136\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: false_positive\n\n```\n\n### 4. Dismiss generated and auto-created code\n\nProtobuf, gRPC, OpenAPI generators, and ORM scaffolding tools produce files with flagged patterns that cannot be patched by your team.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Dismiss generated code findings\"\n    description: \"Generated files are not authored by us\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: directory\n            value: \"generated/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: file_path\n            value: \"**/*.pb.go\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: file_path\n            value: \"**/*.generated.*\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: not_applicable\n\n```\n\n### 5. Dismiss infrastructure-mitigated vulnerabilities\n\nVulnerability classes like XSS (CWE-79) or SQL injection (CWE-89) that are already addressed by WAF rules or runtime protection. Only use this when mitigating controls are verified and consistently enforced.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Dismiss CWEs mitigated by WAF\"\n    description: \"XSS and SQLi mitigated by WAF rules\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CWE-79\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CWE-89\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: mitigating_control\n\n```\n\n### 6. Dismiss CVE families across your organization\n\nA wave of related CVEs for a widely-used library your team has assessed? Apply at the group level to dismiss them across dozens of projects. The wildcard pattern (e.g., `CVE-2021-44*`) matches all CVEs with that prefix.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Accept risk for log4j CVE family\"\n    description: \"Log4j CVEs mitigated by version pinning and WAF\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CVE-2021-44*\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: acceptable_risk\n\n```\n\n## Quick reference\n\n| Parameter | Details |\n|-----------|---------|\n| **Criteria types** | `file_path` (glob patterns, e.g., `test/**/*`), `directory` (e.g., `vendor/*`), `identifier` (CVE/CWE with wildcards, e.g., `CVE-2023-*`) |\n| **Dismissal reasons** | `acceptable_risk`, `false_positive`, `mitigating_control`, `used_in_tests`, `not_applicable` |\n| **Criteria logic** | Multiple criteria within a rule = AND (must match all). Multiple rules within a policy = OR (match any). |\n| **Limits** | 3 criteria per rule, 5 rules per policy, 5 policies per security policy project. Vulnerabilty management policy actions process 1000 vulnerabilities per pipeline run in the target project, until all matching vulnerabilities are processed. |\n| **Affected statuses** | Needs triage, Confirmed |\n| **Scope** | Project-level or group-level (group-level applies across all projects) |\n\n## Getting started\nHere's how to get started with auto-dismiss policies:\n\n1. **Identify the noise.** Open your vulnerability report and sort by \"Needs triage.\" Look for patterns: test files, vendored code, the same CVE across projects.\n\n2. **Pick a scenario.** Start with whichever use case above accounts for the most findings.\n\n3. **Record your baseline.** Note the number of \"Needs triage\" vulnerabilities before creating a policy.\n\n4. **Create and enable.** Navigate to **Secure > Policies > New policy > Vulnerability management policy**. Paste the configuration from the use case above, then merge the MR.\n\n5. **Validate results.** After the next default-branch pipeline, filter by status \"Dismissed\" to confirm the right findings were handled.\n\nFor full configuration details, see the [vulnerability management policy documentation](https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/policies/vulnerability_management_policy/#auto-dismiss-policies).\n\n> Ready to take control of vulnerability noise? [Start a free GitLab Ultimate trial](https://about.gitlab.com/free-trial/) and configure your first auto-dismiss policy today.\n",{"slug":742,"featured":27,"template":13},"auto-dismiss-vulnerability-management-policy",{"content":744,"config":753},{"title":745,"description":746,"authors":747,"heroImage":749,"date":750,"body":751,"category":9,"tags":752},"GitLab 18.10 brings AI-native triage and remediation ","Learn about GitLab Duo Agent Platform capabilities that cut noise, surface real vulnerabilities, and turn findings into proposed fixes.",[748],"Alisa Ho","https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1773843921/rm35fx4gylrsu9alf2fx.png","2026-03-19","GitLab 18.10 introduces new AI-powered security capabilities focused on improving the quality and speed of vulnerability management. Together, these features can help reduce the time developers spend investigating false positives and bring automated remediation directly into their workflow, so they can fix vulnerabilities without needing to be security experts.\n\nHere is what’s new:\n\n* [**Static Application Security Testing (SAST) false positive detection**](https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/vulnerabilities/false_positive_detection/) **is now generally available.** This flow uses an LLM for agentic reasoning to determine the likelihood that a vulnerability is a false positive or not, so security and development teams can focus on remediating critical vulnerabilities first.  \n* [**Agentic SAST vulnerability resolution**](https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/vulnerabilities/agentic_vulnerability_resolution/) **is now in beta.** Agentic SAST vulnerability resolution automatically creates a merge request with a proposed fix for verified SAST vulnerabilities, which can shorten time to remediation and reduce the need for deep security expertise.  \n* [**Secret false positive detection**](https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/vulnerabilities/secret_false_positive_detection/) **is now in beta.** This flow brings the same AI-powered noise reduction to secret detection, flagging dummy and test secrets to save review effort.\n\nThese flows are available to GitLab Ultimate customers using GitLab Duo Agent Platform. \n\n## Cut triage time with SAST false positive detection\n\nTraditional SAST scanners flag every suspicious code pattern they find, regardless of whether code paths are reachable or frameworks already handle the risk. Without runtime context, they cannot distinguish a real vulnerability from safe code that just looks dangerous.\n\nThis means developers could spend hours investigating findings that turn out to be false positives. Over time, that can erode confidence in the report and slow down the teams responsible for fixing real risks.\n\nAfter each SAST scan, GitLab Duo Agent Platform automatically analyzes new critical and high severity findings and attaches:\n\n* A confidence score indicating how likely the finding is to be a false positive  \n* An AI-generated explanation describing the reasoning  \n* A visual badge that makes “Likely false positive” versus “Likely real” easy to scan in the UI\n\nThese findings appear in the [Vulnerability Report](https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/vulnerability_report/), as shown below. You can filter the report to focus on findings marked as “Not false positive” so teams can spend their time addressing real vulnerabilities instead of sifting through noise.\n\n![Vulnerability report](https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1773844787/i0eod01p7gawflllkgsr.png)\n\n\nGitLab Duo Agent Platform's assessment is a recommendation. You stay in control of every false positive to determine if it is valid, and you can audit the agent's reasoning at any time to build confidence in the model. \n\n\n## Turn vulnerabilities into automated fixes\n\nKnowing that a vulnerability is real is only half the work.  Remediation still requires understanding the code path, writing a safe patch, and making sure nothing else breaks.\n\nIf the vulnerability is identified as likely not be a false positive by the SAST false positive detection flow, the Agentic SAST vulnerability resolution flow automatically:\n\n1. Reads the vulnerable code and surrounding context from your repository  \n2. Generates high-quality proposed fixes  \n3. Validates fixes through automated testing   \n4. Opens a merge request with a proposed fix that includes:  \n   * Concrete code changes  \n   * A confidence score  \n   * An explanation of what changed and why\n\nIn this demo, you’ll see how GitLab can automatically take a SAST vulnerability all the way from detection to a ready-to-review merge request. Watch how the agent reads the code, generates and validates a fix, and opens an MR with clear, explainable changes so developers can remediate faster without being security experts.\n\n\u003Ciframe src=\"https://player.vimeo.com/video/1174573325?badge=0&autopause=0&player_id=0&app_id=58479\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"autoplay; fullscreen; picture-in-picture; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;\" title=\"GitLab 18.10 AI SAST False Positive Auto Remediation\">\u003C/iframe>\u003Cscript src=\"https://player.vimeo.com/api/player.js\">\u003C/script>\n\nAs with any AI-generated suggestion, you should review the proposed merge request carefully before merging.\n\n## Surface real secrets\n\nSecret detection is only useful if teams trust the results. When reports are full of test credentials, placeholder values, and example tokens, developers may waste time reviewing noise instead of fixing real exposures. That can slow remediation and decrease confidence in the scan.\n\nSecret false positive detection helps teams focus on the secrets that matter so they can reduce risk faster. When it runs on the default branch, it will automatically:\n\n1. Analyze each finding to spot likely test credentials, example values, and dummy secrets  \n2. Assign a confidence score for whether the finding is a real risk or a likely false positive  \n3. Generate an explanation for why the secret is being treated as real or noise  \n4. Add a badge in the Vulnerability Report so developers can see the status at a glance\n\nDevelopers can also trigger this analysis manually from the Vulnerability Report by selecting **“Check for false positive”** on any secret detection finding, helping them clear out findings that do not pose risk and focus on real secrets sooner.\n\n## Try AI-powered security today\n\nGitLab 18.10 introduces capabilities that cover the full vulnerability workflow, from cutting false positive noise in SAST and secret detection to automatically generating merge requests with proposed fixes.\n\nTo see how AI-powered security can help cut review time and turn findings into ready-to-merge fixes, [start a free trial of GitLab Duo Agent Platform today](https://about.gitlab.com/gitlab-duo-agent-platform/?utm_medium=blog&utm_source=blog&utm_campaign=eg_global_x_x_security_en_).",[739,9,738],{"featured":12,"template":13,"slug":754},"gitlab-18-10-brings-ai-native-triage-and-remediation",{"promotions":756},[757,771,782,793],{"id":758,"categories":759,"header":761,"text":762,"button":763,"image":768},"ai-modernization",[760],"ai-ml","Is AI achieving its promise at scale?","Quiz will take 5 minutes or less",{"text":764,"config":765},"Get your AI maturity score",{"href":766,"dataGaName":767,"dataGaLocation":242},"/assessments/ai-modernization-assessment/","modernization assessment",{"config":769},{"src":770},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1772138786/qix0m7kwnd8x2fh1zq49.png",{"id":772,"categories":773,"header":774,"text":762,"button":775,"image":779},"devops-modernization",[739,568],"Are you just managing tools or shipping innovation?",{"text":776,"config":777},"Get your DevOps maturity score",{"href":778,"dataGaName":767,"dataGaLocation":242},"/assessments/devops-modernization-assessment/",{"config":780},{"src":781},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1772138785/eg818fmakweyuznttgid.png",{"id":783,"categories":784,"header":785,"text":762,"button":786,"image":790},"security-modernization",[9],"Are you trading speed for security?",{"text":787,"config":788},"Get your security maturity score",{"href":789,"dataGaName":767,"dataGaLocation":242},"/assessments/security-modernization-assessment/",{"config":791},{"src":792},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1772138786/p4pbqd9nnjejg5ds6mdk.png",{"id":794,"paths":795,"header":798,"text":799,"button":800,"image":805},"github-azure-migration",[796,797],"migration-from-azure-devops-to-gitlab","integrating-azure-devops-scm-and-gitlab","Is your team ready for GitHub's Azure move?","GitHub is already rebuilding around Azure. Find out what it means for you.",{"text":801,"config":802},"See how GitLab compares to GitHub",{"href":803,"dataGaName":804,"dataGaLocation":242},"/compare/gitlab-vs-github/github-azure-migration/","github azure migration",{"config":806},{"src":781},{"header":808,"blurb":809,"button":810,"secondaryButton":815},"Start building faster today","See what your team can do with the intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps.\n",{"text":811,"config":812},"Get your free trial",{"href":813,"dataGaName":49,"dataGaLocation":814},"https://gitlab.com/-/trial_registrations/new?glm_content=default-saas-trial&glm_source=about.gitlab.com/","feature",{"text":504,"config":816},{"href":53,"dataGaName":54,"dataGaLocation":814},1777302630763]