[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":813},["ShallowReactive",2],{"/en-us/blog/top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab":3,"navigation-en-us":34,"banner-en-us":444,"footer-en-us":454,"blog-post-authors-en-us-Madeline Lake":696,"blog-related-posts-en-us-top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab":710,"blog-promotions-en-us":751,"next-steps-en-us":803},{"id":4,"title":5,"authorSlugs":6,"body":8,"categorySlug":9,"config":10,"content":14,"description":8,"extension":23,"isFeatured":12,"meta":24,"navigation":25,"path":26,"publishedDate":20,"seo":27,"stem":31,"tagSlugs":32,"__hash__":33},"blogPosts/en-us/blog/top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab.yml","Top 5 Compliance Features To Leverage In Gitlab",[7],"madeline-lake",null,"security",{"slug":11,"featured":12,"template":13},"top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab",false,"BlogPost",{"title":15,"description":16,"authors":17,"heroImage":19,"date":20,"body":21,"category":9,"tags":22},"Top 5 compliance features to leverage in GitLab","Highlighting features we use daily, our security team outlines 5 ways to configure your GitLab instance for increased security and compliance.",[18],"Madeline Lake","https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1749679391/Blog/Hero%20Images/pexels-5strike.jpg","2022-07-13","\n\nGitLab's [compliance management capabilities](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/administration/compliance.html) are designed to integrate compliance into development and deployment processes from the start. As a tenured compliance professional and member of our [Security Compliance team here at GitLab](https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/security/security-assurance/security-compliance/), I can tell you from experience it is always easiest to design your processes to be secure and compliant from the start than it is to re-engineer existing processes to be compliant.\n\n**Why should you care about your GitLab instance being secure and compliant?**\nIn additon to reducing the risk of a breach and lowering costs, there are regulatory and compliance requirements to consider.\nTypically regulatory and compliance audits are unavoidable and can be time-consuming and stressful. However, GitLab has many easy-to-use, built-in features that may help fulfill your organization's compliance requirements and make your environment more secure. Here at GitLab, these are features we use everyday. The best part is, most of the features I'll outline below are included as [free features](/pricing/feature-comparison/).\n\n_Note: I'll add an asterisk (*) next to any feature which is not available on our free tier._\n\n**Here's the tl;dr list:**\n- [Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)](/blog/top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab/#1-enable-mfa)\n- [Review privileged access for critical projects](/blog/top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab/#2-review-privileged-access-for-critical-projects)\n- [Turn on protected branches](/blog/top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab/#3-turn-on-protected-branches)\n- [Activate merge request approval settings](/blog/top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab/#4-activate-merge-request-approval-settings-)\n- [Configure audit events](/blog/top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab/#5-configure-audit-events-)\n\n\n## 1. Enable MFA\n\nEnabling MFA is simple and reduces the risk of attacks by making it more difficult to gain access to accounts.\n\nMFA can be enforced for all users in your GitLab instance in the admin center. Alternatively, MFA can be configured for accounts individually.\n\nYou can learn [how to enable MFA in our GitLab documentation](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/profile/account/two_factor_authentication.html).\n\n### Compliance standards and GitLab controls for MFA\n\nMFA relates to the following compliance standards:\n- AICPA TSC CC6.1\n- ISO 27001 2013 A9.2.3, A9.2.4, A.9.3.1, A9.4.3\n- NIST 800-53 IA-5, IA-5(1), IA-2(1), IA-2(2)\n\nIllustrative [GitLab controls for MFA](https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/security/security-assurance/security-compliance/guidance/identification-and-authentication.html):\n- IAC-02: GitLab Inc. has implemented mechanisms to uniquely identify and authenticate organizational users and processes acting on behalf of organizational users.\n- IAC-06: GitLab Inc. has implemented automated mechanisms to enforce MFA for: remote network access; and/or non-console access to critical systems or systems that store, transmit and/or process sensitive data.\n\n## 2. Review privileged access for critical projects\n\nUndoubtedly, one of the biggest risks to your environment is logical access. To reduce the risk, we recommend administrators ensure access is restricted based on the [principle of least privilege](https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/security/access-management-policy.html#principle-of-least-privilege). Access should be monitored continuously as access changes can occur multiple times, daily, in most organizations. In order to appropriately review access in your GitLab instance, it is important to first understand the access security structure within GitLab.\n\n### Breaking down the access security structure\n\nWithin GitLab, there are six different roles that can be assigned to users - “Guest”, “Reporter”, “Developer”, “Maintainer”, “Owner” and “Administrator”.  Privileged access within GitLab is considered to be the “Administrator”, “Owners”, and “Maintainers” roles.\n\n#### GitLab Administrators receive all permissions\n\nOwners and Maintainers are considered administrative because these roles have permissions to do highly sensitive actions including but not limited to: managing merge settings; enabling or disabling branch protection; managing access to a project; managing access tokens; exporting a project; and deleting issues, merge requests, and projects.\n\nAs privileged access is the highest risk to your environment, these roles should be tightly controlled.\n\n**Some best practices in regards to ensuring access is restricted based on the principle of least privilege include:**\n- When privileged access is requested, ensure appropriate approvals are received prior to access being provisioned. _Best practice is to obtain approvals from the data owner and the manager of the user who's receiving access._\n- When a user changes job responsibilities or leaves the organization, ensure access is deprovisioned timely and any shared passwords or tokens are rotated. _Best practice is to do this within 72 hours or less._\n- Be sure to review access on a periodic basis to ensure access is still appropriately aligned to a user's job responsibilities. _Best practice is to do this on a quarterly basis and have access reviewed by the data owner._\n\n#### What to do when you identify inappropriate access\n\nWhen inappropriate access is identified, it is important to take immediate, mitigating actions by checking the user's last login date and checking audit logs as they are available to ensure no inappropriate transactions were performed. These mitigating actions should be conducted upon identification to ensure accessibility of information and to understand potential exposure.\n\nRefer to our [GitLab documentation regarding permissions and roles](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/permissions.html) for more information.\n\n### Compliance standards and GitLab controls for privileged access\n\nPrivileged access relates to the following compliance standards:\n- AICPA TSC CC6.1, CC6.2, CC6.3\n- ISO 27001 2013 A9.2.1, A9.2.2, A9.2.3, A9.4.4\n- NIST 800-53 IA-12(4)\n\nIllustrative [GitLab controls for privileged access](https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/security/security-assurance/security-compliance/guidance/identification-and-authentication.html):\n- IAC-07: GitLab Inc. has implemented mechanisms to utilize a formal user registration and de-registration process that governs the assignment of access rights.\n- IAC-16: GitLab Inc. has implemented mechanisms to restrict and control privileged access rights for users and services.\n- IAC-17: GitLab Inc. has implemented mechanisms to periodically review the privileges assigned to users to validate the need for such privileges; and reassign or remove privileges, if necessary, to correctly reflect organizational mission and business needs.\n\n## 3. Turn on protected branches\n\nWithin GitLab, role-based access can be used to give access to repositories and branches at the project level.  By utilizing protected branches, further restrictions can be configured on certain branches in order to protect them. Protecting your default branch is the most important; this branch is often called \"master\" or \"main\".\n\nSome best practice in regards to protection rules include:\n* Prevent commits directly into the default branch\n* Require a merge request each time there is a commit\n* Require approval by a codeowner before merging code\n\nProtected branches should be configured in accordance with your organization's change management policy. Here's an example of how to configure protection rules according to our recommendations:\n\n![file name](https://about.gitlab.com/images/blogimages/top-5/protected_branch_example.png){: .shadow}\nExample of how to configure branch protection rules\n\n\n\nThis example shows that anyone with the “developer” and “maintainer” roles are allowed to merge to the default branch and “no one” is allowed to push directly to the default branch without a merge request. Further, codeowner approval must be obtained prior to merging.\n\nProtected branches can be modified by anyone with at least “maintainer” access. In order to monitor if protected branch settings are inappropriately modified, administrators should consider implementing a monitoring control by utilizing audit events.\n\nRefer to our [GitLab documentation regarding protected branches](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/protected_branches.html#protected-branches) for more information.\n\n\n### Compliance standards and GitLab controls for branch protection\n\nBranch protection settings relate to the following compliance standards:\n- COSO Principle 9\n- AICPA TSC CC3.4, CC8.1\n- ISO 27001 2013 A12.1.2, A14.2.2, A.14.2.6, A.14.2.9\n- NIST 800-53 CM-3, CM-3(2), SA-8(31), SI-6\n\nIllustrative [GitLab controls for branch protection settings](https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/security/security-assurance/security-compliance/guidance/change-management.html) include:\n- CHG-04: GitLab Inc. has implemented mechanisms to enforce configuration restrictions in an effort to restrict the ability of users to conduct unauthorized changes.\n\n## 4. Activate merge request approval settings *\n\nChanges to your project repository typically start with a merge request. If your default branch is protected, commits must be done through a merge request. By configuring your merge request settings with approval rules ensures that changes are properly approved prior to deployment to production. Within the merge request approval settings you can specify the number of approvals required and the allowed approvers for specific merge requests.\n\nIn addition, there are a number of approval settings that further enforce segregation of duties within change management:\n- [Prevent approval by author](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/approvals/settings.html#prevent-approval-by-author): When enabled, the author cannot also provide one of the required approvals.\n- [Prevent approvals by users who add commits](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/approvals/settings.html#prevent-approvals-by-users-who-add-commits): When enabled, users who have committed to a merge request cannot also approve it.\n- [Prevent editing approval rules in merge requests](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/approvals/settings.html#prevent-editing-approval-rules-in-merge-requests): When enabled, users can’t override the project’s approval rules on merge requests.\n- [Require user password to approve](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/approvals/settings.html#require-user-password-to-approve): When enabled, users must first authenticate with a password prior to submitting approval.\n- [Remove all approvals when commits are added to the source branch](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/approvals/settings.html#remove-all-approvals-when-commits-are-added-to-the-source-branch): When enabled, this removes all existing approvals on a merge request when more changes are added to it.\n\nMerge request approval settings should be configured in accordance with your organization's change management policy. An example of how to configure merge requests according to the best practices outlined above is as follows:\n\n![file name](https://about.gitlab.com/images/blogimages/top-5/mr_approval_example.png){: .shadow}\nExample of how to configure merge requests\n\n\n\nIn the example above, you can see that at least two approvers are required: to enforce segregation of duties and that the approval settings are enforced.\n\nIf your change management policy requires approvals from different groups or departments, such as the business owner and the data owner, those approval groups can be added as additional approval rules. When enabled, these settings provide reasonable assurance that your organization’s GitLab instance enforces segregation of duties and systematically enforces your organizational change management policy.\n\nTo ensure all projects under a certain group have the same merge request approval settings, at the top-level group, [group approval settings](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/group/#group-merge-request-approval-settings) can be configured. These settings cascade to all projects that belong to the group.\n\nMerge request approval settings can be modified by anyone with at least “maintainer” access. In order to monitor if merge request approval settings are inappropriately modified, consider implementing a monitoring control by utilizing audit events.\n\nFor more information, refer to our GitLab documentation around merge request [approvals](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/approvals/index.html) and [settings](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/approvals/settings.html).\n\n### Compliance standards and GitLab controls for merge approvals\n\nMerge approval settings relate to the following compliance standards:\n- COSO Principle 9\n- AICPA TSC CC3.4, CC8.1\n- ISO 27001 2013 A12.1.2, A14.2.2, A.14.2.6, A.14.2.9,\n- NIST 800-53 CM-3, CM-3(2), SA-8(31), SI-6\n\nIllustrative [GitLab controls for merge approval settings](https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/security/security-assurance/security-compliance/guidance/change-management.html) include:\n* CHG-04: GitLab Inc. has implemented mechanisms to enforce configuration restrictions in an effort to restrict the ability of users to conduct unauthorized changes.\n\n## 5. Configure audit events *\n\nAudit events are a way to view changes made within GitLab and can be leveraged as a detective and monitoring control for continuous monitoring of configured settings. A report can be generated on the audit event, which can then be provided to auditors to evidence your company’s compliance for the audit period for a specific, configured setting.\n\nAudit events can be configured at the group, project and instance level.\n\nIt is best practice to monitor the following [audit events](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/administration/audit_events.html#project-events) in your GitLab environment:\n- merge approval settings\n- protected branch settings\n\nAs previously mentioned, merge approval settings and protected branch settings can be modified by anyone with “maintainer” access. By monitoring these critical settings for audit events, it can be determined if the protected branch settings or merge approval settings were modified during the period. If the settings were modified, investigation can occur to understand the potential impact and be an indicator to turn the setting back on.\n\nHere’s an example of what these audit events look like:\n\n![file name](https://about.gitlab.com/images/blogimages/top-5/audit_event_example.png){: .shadow}\nExample of audit events\n\n\n\nIn this example of audit events, we see the following:\n- The merge approval settings “require new approvals when new commits are added to an MR” was turned off on the project.\n- The number of required approvals was reduced from 2 to 1.\n- Merging is now allowed by anyone on the default branch.\nThese changes would alter the protected branch settings and merge approval settings that were previously configured.\n\n[Audit events can be streamed](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/administration/audit_event_streaming.html) to third-party systems. The advantage of this is to integrate into a security information and event management (SIEM) system for centralized monitoring and alerting.\n\nTo learn more, check out the [GitLab documentation surrounding audit events](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/administration/audit_events.html).\n\n### Compliance standards and GitLab controls for audit events\n\nAudit events relate to the following compliance standards:\n- COSO Principle 13\n- AICPA TSC CC4.1, CC7.2\n- ISO 27001 2013 A12.4.1, A12.4.3\n- NIST 800-53 AU-2\n\nIllustrative [GitLab controls for audit events](https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/security/security-assurance/security-compliance/guidance/continuous-monitoring.html):\n- CHG-07: Audit events are reviewed quarterly to ensure no inappropriate changes to key change management Segregation Of Duties (SOD) settings.\n- MON-03: Configure systems to produce audit records that contain sufficient information to, at a minimum: establish what type of event occurred; when (date and time) the event occurred; where the event occurred; the source of the event; the outcome (success or failure) of the event; and the identity of any user/subject associated with the event.\n\nHow does GitLab help you maintain your compliance? Have a favorite feature that helps your org maintain its compliance that we missed, let us know in the comments!\n\nInterested in learning more about how your organization can leverage the compliance features offered within GitLab? [Connect with a specialist to learn more](/sales/).\n\n**Note:** An asterisk (*) denotes a feature which is not available on our free tier.\n\n\nCover image by [Miguel Á. Padriñán](https://www.pexels.com/@padrinan/) on [Pexels](https://www.pexels.com/photo/5-strike-symbol-1010973/)\n",[9],"yml",{},true,"/en-us/blog/top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab",{"title":15,"description":16,"ogTitle":15,"ogDescription":16,"noIndex":12,"ogImage":19,"ogUrl":28,"ogSiteName":29,"ogType":30,"canonicalUrls":28},"https://about.gitlab.com/blog/top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab","https://about.gitlab.com","article","en-us/blog/top-5-compliance-features-to-leverage-in-gitlab",[9],"KlGdBJW3B0au4mUud3QW9qsMtyA7baTjZj8JcJoddYs",{"data":35},{"logo":36,"freeTrial":41,"sales":46,"login":51,"items":56,"search":364,"minimal":395,"duo":414,"switchNav":423,"pricingDeployment":434},{"config":37},{"href":38,"dataGaName":39,"dataGaLocation":40},"/","gitlab logo","header",{"text":42,"config":43},"Get free trial",{"href":44,"dataGaName":45,"dataGaLocation":40},"https://gitlab.com/-/trial_registrations/new?glm_source=about.gitlab.com&glm_content=default-saas-trial/","free trial",{"text":47,"config":48},"Talk to sales",{"href":49,"dataGaName":50,"dataGaLocation":40},"/sales/","sales",{"text":52,"config":53},"Sign in",{"href":54,"dataGaName":55,"dataGaLocation":40},"https://gitlab.com/users/sign_in/","sign in",[57,84,179,184,285,345],{"text":58,"config":59,"cards":61},"Platform",{"dataNavLevelOne":60},"platform",[62,68,76],{"title":58,"description":63,"link":64},"The intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps",{"text":65,"config":66},"Explore our Platform",{"href":67,"dataGaName":60,"dataGaLocation":40},"/platform/",{"title":69,"description":70,"link":71},"GitLab Duo Agent Platform","Agentic AI for the entire software lifecycle",{"text":72,"config":73},"Meet GitLab Duo",{"href":74,"dataGaName":75,"dataGaLocation":40},"/gitlab-duo-agent-platform/","gitlab duo agent platform",{"title":77,"description":78,"link":79},"Why GitLab","See the top reasons enterprises choose GitLab",{"text":80,"config":81},"Learn more",{"href":82,"dataGaName":83,"dataGaLocation":40},"/why-gitlab/","why gitlab",{"text":85,"left":25,"config":86,"link":88,"lists":92,"footer":161},"Product",{"dataNavLevelOne":87},"solutions",{"text":89,"config":90},"View all Solutions",{"href":91,"dataGaName":87,"dataGaLocation":40},"/solutions/",[93,117,140],{"title":94,"description":95,"link":96,"items":101},"Automation","CI/CD and automation to accelerate deployment",{"config":97},{"icon":98,"href":99,"dataGaName":100,"dataGaLocation":40},"AutomatedCodeAlt","/solutions/delivery-automation/","automated software delivery",[102,106,109,113],{"text":103,"config":104},"CI/CD",{"href":105,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":103},"/solutions/continuous-integration/",{"text":69,"config":107},{"href":74,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":108},"gitlab duo agent platform - product menu",{"text":110,"config":111},"Source Code Management",{"href":112,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":110},"/solutions/source-code-management/",{"text":114,"config":115},"Automated Software Delivery",{"href":99,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":116},"Automated software delivery",{"title":118,"description":119,"link":120,"items":125},"Security","Deliver code faster without compromising security",{"config":121},{"href":122,"dataGaName":123,"dataGaLocation":40,"icon":124},"/solutions/application-security-testing/","security and compliance","ShieldCheckLight",[126,130,135],{"text":127,"config":128},"Application Security Testing",{"href":122,"dataGaName":129,"dataGaLocation":40},"Application security testing",{"text":131,"config":132},"Software Supply Chain Security",{"href":133,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":134},"/solutions/supply-chain/","Software supply chain security",{"text":136,"config":137},"Software Compliance",{"href":138,"dataGaName":139,"dataGaLocation":40},"/solutions/software-compliance/","software compliance",{"title":141,"link":142,"items":147},"Measurement",{"config":143},{"icon":144,"href":145,"dataGaName":146,"dataGaLocation":40},"DigitalTransformation","/solutions/visibility-measurement/","visibility and measurement",[148,152,156],{"text":149,"config":150},"Visibility & Measurement",{"href":145,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":151},"Visibility and Measurement",{"text":153,"config":154},"Value Stream Management",{"href":155,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":153},"/solutions/value-stream-management/",{"text":157,"config":158},"Analytics & Insights",{"href":159,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":160},"/solutions/analytics-and-insights/","Analytics and insights",{"title":162,"items":163},"GitLab for",[164,169,174],{"text":165,"config":166},"Enterprise",{"href":167,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":168},"/enterprise/","enterprise",{"text":170,"config":171},"Small Business",{"href":172,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":173},"/small-business/","small business",{"text":175,"config":176},"Public Sector",{"href":177,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":178},"/solutions/public-sector/","public sector",{"text":180,"config":181},"Pricing",{"href":182,"dataGaName":183,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataNavLevelOne":183},"/pricing/","pricing",{"text":185,"config":186,"link":188,"lists":192,"feature":272},"Resources",{"dataNavLevelOne":187},"resources",{"text":189,"config":190},"View all resources",{"href":191,"dataGaName":187,"dataGaLocation":40},"/resources/",[193,226,244],{"title":194,"items":195},"Getting started",[196,201,206,211,216,221],{"text":197,"config":198},"Install",{"href":199,"dataGaName":200,"dataGaLocation":40},"/install/","install",{"text":202,"config":203},"Quick start guides",{"href":204,"dataGaName":205,"dataGaLocation":40},"/get-started/","quick setup checklists",{"text":207,"config":208},"Learn",{"href":209,"dataGaLocation":40,"dataGaName":210},"https://university.gitlab.com/","learn",{"text":212,"config":213},"Product documentation",{"href":214,"dataGaName":215,"dataGaLocation":40},"https://docs.gitlab.com/","product documentation",{"text":217,"config":218},"Best practice videos",{"href":219,"dataGaName":220,"dataGaLocation":40},"/getting-started-videos/","best practice videos",{"text":222,"config":223},"Integrations",{"href":224,"dataGaName":225,"dataGaLocation":40},"/integrations/","integrations",{"title":227,"items":228},"Discover",[229,234,239],{"text":230,"config":231},"Customer success stories",{"href":232,"dataGaName":233,"dataGaLocation":40},"/customers/","customer success stories",{"text":235,"config":236},"Blog",{"href":237,"dataGaName":238,"dataGaLocation":40},"/blog/","blog",{"text":240,"config":241},"Remote",{"href":242,"dataGaName":243,"dataGaLocation":40},"https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/company/culture/all-remote/","remote",{"title":245,"items":246},"Connect",[247,252,257,262,267],{"text":248,"config":249},"GitLab Services",{"href":250,"dataGaName":251,"dataGaLocation":40},"/services/","services",{"text":253,"config":254},"Community",{"href":255,"dataGaName":256,"dataGaLocation":40},"/community/","community",{"text":258,"config":259},"Forum",{"href":260,"dataGaName":261,"dataGaLocation":40},"https://forum.gitlab.com/","forum",{"text":263,"config":264},"Events",{"href":265,"dataGaName":266,"dataGaLocation":40},"/events/","events",{"text":268,"config":269},"Partners",{"href":270,"dataGaName":271,"dataGaLocation":40},"/partners/","partners",{"backgroundColor":273,"textColor":274,"text":275,"image":276,"link":280},"#2f2a6b","#fff","Insights for the future of software development",{"altText":277,"config":278},"the source promo card",{"src":279},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1758208064/dzl0dbift9xdizyelkk4.svg",{"text":281,"config":282},"Read the latest",{"href":283,"dataGaName":284,"dataGaLocation":40},"/the-source/","the source",{"text":286,"config":287,"lists":289},"Company",{"dataNavLevelOne":288},"company",[290],{"items":291},[292,297,303,305,310,315,320,325,330,335,340],{"text":293,"config":294},"About",{"href":295,"dataGaName":296,"dataGaLocation":40},"/company/","about",{"text":298,"config":299,"footerGa":302},"Jobs",{"href":300,"dataGaName":301,"dataGaLocation":40},"/jobs/","jobs",{"dataGaName":301},{"text":263,"config":304},{"href":265,"dataGaName":266,"dataGaLocation":40},{"text":306,"config":307},"Leadership",{"href":308,"dataGaName":309,"dataGaLocation":40},"/company/team/e-group/","leadership",{"text":311,"config":312},"Team",{"href":313,"dataGaName":314,"dataGaLocation":40},"/company/team/","team",{"text":316,"config":317},"Handbook",{"href":318,"dataGaName":319,"dataGaLocation":40},"https://handbook.gitlab.com/","handbook",{"text":321,"config":322},"Investor relations",{"href":323,"dataGaName":324,"dataGaLocation":40},"https://ir.gitlab.com/","investor relations",{"text":326,"config":327},"Trust Center",{"href":328,"dataGaName":329,"dataGaLocation":40},"/security/","trust center",{"text":331,"config":332},"AI Transparency Center",{"href":333,"dataGaName":334,"dataGaLocation":40},"/ai-transparency-center/","ai transparency center",{"text":336,"config":337},"Newsletter",{"href":338,"dataGaName":339,"dataGaLocation":40},"/company/contact/#contact-forms","newsletter",{"text":341,"config":342},"Press",{"href":343,"dataGaName":344,"dataGaLocation":40},"/press/","press",{"text":346,"config":347,"lists":348},"Contact us",{"dataNavLevelOne":288},[349],{"items":350},[351,354,359],{"text":47,"config":352},{"href":49,"dataGaName":353,"dataGaLocation":40},"talk to sales",{"text":355,"config":356},"Support portal",{"href":357,"dataGaName":358,"dataGaLocation":40},"https://support.gitlab.com","support portal",{"text":360,"config":361},"Customer portal",{"href":362,"dataGaName":363,"dataGaLocation":40},"https://customers.gitlab.com/customers/sign_in/","customer portal",{"close":365,"login":366,"suggestions":373},"Close",{"text":367,"link":368},"To search repositories and projects, login to",{"text":369,"config":370},"gitlab.com",{"href":54,"dataGaName":371,"dataGaLocation":372},"search login","search",{"text":374,"default":375},"Suggestions",[376,378,382,384,388,392],{"text":69,"config":377},{"href":74,"dataGaName":69,"dataGaLocation":372},{"text":379,"config":380},"Code Suggestions (AI)",{"href":381,"dataGaName":379,"dataGaLocation":372},"/solutions/code-suggestions/",{"text":103,"config":383},{"href":105,"dataGaName":103,"dataGaLocation":372},{"text":385,"config":386},"GitLab on AWS",{"href":387,"dataGaName":385,"dataGaLocation":372},"/partners/technology-partners/aws/",{"text":389,"config":390},"GitLab on Google Cloud",{"href":391,"dataGaName":389,"dataGaLocation":372},"/partners/technology-partners/google-cloud-platform/",{"text":393,"config":394},"Why GitLab?",{"href":82,"dataGaName":393,"dataGaLocation":372},{"freeTrial":396,"mobileIcon":401,"desktopIcon":406,"secondaryButton":409},{"text":397,"config":398},"Start free trial",{"href":399,"dataGaName":45,"dataGaLocation":400},"https://gitlab.com/-/trials/new/","nav",{"altText":402,"config":403},"Gitlab Icon",{"src":404,"dataGaName":405,"dataGaLocation":400},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1758203874/jypbw1jx72aexsoohd7x.svg","gitlab icon",{"altText":402,"config":407},{"src":408,"dataGaName":405,"dataGaLocation":400},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1758203875/gs4c8p8opsgvflgkswz9.svg",{"text":410,"config":411},"Get Started",{"href":412,"dataGaName":413,"dataGaLocation":400},"https://gitlab.com/-/trial_registrations/new?glm_source=about.gitlab.com/get-started/","get started",{"freeTrial":415,"mobileIcon":419,"desktopIcon":421},{"text":416,"config":417},"Learn more about GitLab Duo",{"href":74,"dataGaName":418,"dataGaLocation":400},"gitlab duo",{"altText":402,"config":420},{"src":404,"dataGaName":405,"dataGaLocation":400},{"altText":402,"config":422},{"src":408,"dataGaName":405,"dataGaLocation":400},{"button":424,"mobileIcon":429,"desktopIcon":431},{"text":425,"config":426},"/switch",{"href":427,"dataGaName":428,"dataGaLocation":400},"#contact","switch",{"altText":402,"config":430},{"src":404,"dataGaName":405,"dataGaLocation":400},{"altText":402,"config":432},{"src":433,"dataGaName":405,"dataGaLocation":400},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1773335277/ohhpiuoxoldryzrnhfrh.png",{"freeTrial":435,"mobileIcon":440,"desktopIcon":442},{"text":436,"config":437},"Back to pricing",{"href":182,"dataGaName":438,"dataGaLocation":400,"icon":439},"back to pricing","GoBack",{"altText":402,"config":441},{"src":404,"dataGaName":405,"dataGaLocation":400},{"altText":402,"config":443},{"src":408,"dataGaName":405,"dataGaLocation":400},{"title":445,"button":446,"config":451},"See how agentic AI transforms software delivery",{"text":447,"config":448},"Watch GitLab Transcend now",{"href":449,"dataGaName":450,"dataGaLocation":40},"/events/transcend/virtual/","transcend event",{"layout":452,"icon":453,"disabled":25},"release","AiStar",{"data":455},{"text":456,"source":457,"edit":463,"contribute":468,"config":473,"items":478,"minimal":685},"Git is a trademark of Software Freedom Conservancy and our use of 'GitLab' is under license",{"text":458,"config":459},"View page source",{"href":460,"dataGaName":461,"dataGaLocation":462},"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/digital-experience/about-gitlab-com/","page source","footer",{"text":464,"config":465},"Edit this page",{"href":466,"dataGaName":467,"dataGaLocation":462},"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/digital-experience/about-gitlab-com/-/blob/main/content/","web ide",{"text":469,"config":470},"Please contribute",{"href":471,"dataGaName":472,"dataGaLocation":462},"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/digital-experience/about-gitlab-com/-/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/","please contribute",{"twitter":474,"facebook":475,"youtube":476,"linkedin":477},"https://twitter.com/gitlab","https://www.facebook.com/gitlab","https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnMGQ8QHMAnVIsI3xJrihhg","https://www.linkedin.com/company/gitlab-com",[479,526,580,624,651],{"title":180,"links":480,"subMenu":495},[481,485,490],{"text":482,"config":483},"View plans",{"href":182,"dataGaName":484,"dataGaLocation":462},"view plans",{"text":486,"config":487},"Why Premium?",{"href":488,"dataGaName":489,"dataGaLocation":462},"/pricing/premium/","why premium",{"text":491,"config":492},"Why Ultimate?",{"href":493,"dataGaName":494,"dataGaLocation":462},"/pricing/ultimate/","why ultimate",[496],{"title":497,"links":498},"Contact Us",[499,502,504,506,511,516,521],{"text":500,"config":501},"Contact sales",{"href":49,"dataGaName":50,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":355,"config":503},{"href":357,"dataGaName":358,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":360,"config":505},{"href":362,"dataGaName":363,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":507,"config":508},"Status",{"href":509,"dataGaName":510,"dataGaLocation":462},"https://status.gitlab.com/","status",{"text":512,"config":513},"Terms of use",{"href":514,"dataGaName":515,"dataGaLocation":462},"/terms/","terms of use",{"text":517,"config":518},"Privacy statement",{"href":519,"dataGaName":520,"dataGaLocation":462},"/privacy/","privacy statement",{"text":522,"config":523},"Cookie preferences",{"dataGaName":524,"dataGaLocation":462,"id":525,"isOneTrustButton":25},"cookie preferences","ot-sdk-btn",{"title":85,"links":527,"subMenu":536},[528,532],{"text":529,"config":530},"DevSecOps platform",{"href":67,"dataGaName":531,"dataGaLocation":462},"devsecops platform",{"text":533,"config":534},"AI-Assisted Development",{"href":74,"dataGaName":535,"dataGaLocation":462},"ai-assisted development",[537],{"title":538,"links":539},"Topics",[540,545,550,555,560,565,570,575],{"text":541,"config":542},"CICD",{"href":543,"dataGaName":544,"dataGaLocation":462},"/topics/ci-cd/","cicd",{"text":546,"config":547},"GitOps",{"href":548,"dataGaName":549,"dataGaLocation":462},"/topics/gitops/","gitops",{"text":551,"config":552},"DevOps",{"href":553,"dataGaName":554,"dataGaLocation":462},"/topics/devops/","devops",{"text":556,"config":557},"Version Control",{"href":558,"dataGaName":559,"dataGaLocation":462},"/topics/version-control/","version control",{"text":561,"config":562},"DevSecOps",{"href":563,"dataGaName":564,"dataGaLocation":462},"/topics/devsecops/","devsecops",{"text":566,"config":567},"Cloud Native",{"href":568,"dataGaName":569,"dataGaLocation":462},"/topics/cloud-native/","cloud native",{"text":571,"config":572},"AI for Coding",{"href":573,"dataGaName":574,"dataGaLocation":462},"/topics/devops/ai-for-coding/","ai for coding",{"text":576,"config":577},"Agentic AI",{"href":578,"dataGaName":579,"dataGaLocation":462},"/topics/agentic-ai/","agentic ai",{"title":581,"links":582},"Solutions",[583,585,587,592,596,599,603,606,608,611,614,619],{"text":127,"config":584},{"href":122,"dataGaName":127,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":116,"config":586},{"href":99,"dataGaName":100,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":588,"config":589},"Agile development",{"href":590,"dataGaName":591,"dataGaLocation":462},"/solutions/agile-delivery/","agile delivery",{"text":593,"config":594},"SCM",{"href":112,"dataGaName":595,"dataGaLocation":462},"source code management",{"text":541,"config":597},{"href":105,"dataGaName":598,"dataGaLocation":462},"continuous integration & delivery",{"text":600,"config":601},"Value stream management",{"href":155,"dataGaName":602,"dataGaLocation":462},"value stream management",{"text":546,"config":604},{"href":605,"dataGaName":549,"dataGaLocation":462},"/solutions/gitops/",{"text":165,"config":607},{"href":167,"dataGaName":168,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":609,"config":610},"Small business",{"href":172,"dataGaName":173,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":612,"config":613},"Public sector",{"href":177,"dataGaName":178,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":615,"config":616},"Education",{"href":617,"dataGaName":618,"dataGaLocation":462},"/solutions/education/","education",{"text":620,"config":621},"Financial services",{"href":622,"dataGaName":623,"dataGaLocation":462},"/solutions/finance/","financial services",{"title":185,"links":625},[626,628,630,632,635,637,639,641,643,645,647,649],{"text":197,"config":627},{"href":199,"dataGaName":200,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":202,"config":629},{"href":204,"dataGaName":205,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":207,"config":631},{"href":209,"dataGaName":210,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":212,"config":633},{"href":214,"dataGaName":634,"dataGaLocation":462},"docs",{"text":235,"config":636},{"href":237,"dataGaName":238,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":230,"config":638},{"href":232,"dataGaName":233,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":240,"config":640},{"href":242,"dataGaName":243,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":248,"config":642},{"href":250,"dataGaName":251,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":253,"config":644},{"href":255,"dataGaName":256,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":258,"config":646},{"href":260,"dataGaName":261,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":263,"config":648},{"href":265,"dataGaName":266,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":268,"config":650},{"href":270,"dataGaName":271,"dataGaLocation":462},{"title":286,"links":652},[653,655,657,659,661,663,665,669,674,676,678,680],{"text":293,"config":654},{"href":295,"dataGaName":288,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":298,"config":656},{"href":300,"dataGaName":301,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":306,"config":658},{"href":308,"dataGaName":309,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":311,"config":660},{"href":313,"dataGaName":314,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":316,"config":662},{"href":318,"dataGaName":319,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":321,"config":664},{"href":323,"dataGaName":324,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":666,"config":667},"Sustainability",{"href":668,"dataGaName":666,"dataGaLocation":462},"/sustainability/",{"text":670,"config":671},"Diversity, inclusion and belonging (DIB)",{"href":672,"dataGaName":673,"dataGaLocation":462},"/diversity-inclusion-belonging/","Diversity, inclusion and belonging",{"text":326,"config":675},{"href":328,"dataGaName":329,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":336,"config":677},{"href":338,"dataGaName":339,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":341,"config":679},{"href":343,"dataGaName":344,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":681,"config":682},"Modern Slavery Transparency Statement",{"href":683,"dataGaName":684,"dataGaLocation":462},"https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/legal/modern-slavery-act-transparency-statement/","modern slavery transparency statement",{"items":686},[687,690,693],{"text":688,"config":689},"Terms",{"href":514,"dataGaName":515,"dataGaLocation":462},{"text":691,"config":692},"Cookies",{"dataGaName":524,"dataGaLocation":462,"id":525,"isOneTrustButton":25},{"text":694,"config":695},"Privacy",{"href":519,"dataGaName":520,"dataGaLocation":462},[697],{"id":698,"title":18,"body":8,"config":699,"content":701,"description":8,"extension":23,"meta":705,"navigation":25,"path":706,"seo":707,"stem":708,"__hash__":709},"blogAuthors/en-us/blog/authors/madeline-lake.yml",{"template":700},"BlogAuthor",{"name":18,"config":702},{"headshot":703,"ctfId":704},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1749659736/Blog/Author%20Headshots/madlake-headshot.jpg","madlake",{},"/en-us/blog/authors/madeline-lake",{},"en-us/blog/authors/madeline-lake","wc1XeqlglUDVgKznqVDbvWqojsm8nt25Olw0crrDwxk",[711,724,739],{"content":712,"config":722},{"title":713,"description":714,"authors":715,"date":717,"body":718,"category":9,"tags":719,"heroImage":721},"Prepare your pipeline for AI-discovered zero-days","AI is finding vulnerabilities faster than teams can patch. Learn how pipeline enforcement, automated triage, and AI remediation close the gap.",[716],"Omer Azaria","2026-04-20","Anthropic's [Mythos Preview model](https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/) recently identified thousands of zero-day vulnerabilities across every major operating system and web browser, including an OpenBSD bug that went undetected for 27 years. In testing, Mythos autonomously chained four vulnerabilities into a working browser exploit that escaped its sandbox. Anthropic is restricting access to Mythos, but the company’s head of offensive cyber research expects threats to have comparable tooling within six to twelve months.\n\nThe defender side of the equation hasn't kept pace. One third of exploited Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) in the first half of 2025 showed activity on or before disclosure day, before most teams even know there's something to patch. AI is compressing that window further, accelerating attackers and flooding teams with whitehat disclosures faster than they can triage. Defender tooling has improved, but most organizations can't operationalize it fast enough to close the gap between discovery and exploitation.\n\nWhen the window between disclosure and exploitation is measured in hours, the security team can't be the last line of defense. Security has to run where code enters the system: in the pipeline, on every merge request, enforced by policy. The fixes that can be automated should be. The ones that can't need to reach the right human faster than they do today.\n\n## Known vulnerabilities are already outpacing remediation\n\nThe bottleneck isn't detection, it's acting at scale on what teams already know. Sixty percent of breaches in the 2025 Verizon DBIR involved exploiting known vulnerabilities where a patch was already available. Teams couldn’t close them in time.\n\nThe backlog was untenable before Mythos. Developers spend [11 hours per month remediating vulnerabilities](https://about.gitlab.com/resources/developer-survey/) post-release instead of shipping new work. Over half of organizations have at least one open internet-facing vulnerability, and the median time to close half of those is 361 days. Exploitation takes hours, while remediation takes months.\n\nAI-assisted development is widening the gap, and stakeholders know it. By June 2025, AI-generated code was adding over 10,000 new security findings per month across Fortune 50 repositories, a 10x jump from six months earlier. Georgia Tech identified 34 [CVEs attributable to AI-generated code](https://research.gatech.edu/bad-vibes-ai-generated-code-vulnerable-researchers-warn) in March 2026, up from 6 in January, and that count reflects only the ones where AI authorship is clear. AI coding assistants hallucinate package names, reach for outdated patterns, and copy insecure examples from training data. More code, more dependencies, and more vulnerabilities per line are generated faster than security teams can review them.\n\nDefenders need to harness frontier AI models, too — not bolted onto the SDLC as external tooling, but running inside the same policies, approvals, and audit trail as the rest of the team. \n\n## Security at the speed of AI coding\n\nWhen a critical CVE drops, how quickly can your team confirm which projects are affected? How many tools does an alert cross before a developer can submit a fix?\n\nThe teams that benefit most from AI already have policies, enforcement, and controls embedded in their development workflows. AI amplifies that foundation. It doesn't replace it.\n\n**Enforcement at the point of change.** As exploitation windows compress, every line of code entering a repository needs to pass through a defined set of controls. Not a separate review, in a different tool, by a different team. Organizations need the ability to enforce security policies across every group and project, with the merge request as the enforcement point. Policies defined once, applied everywhere, with exceptions reviewed, approved, and logged.\n\n**Simple issues caught before the merge request, not during.** Hardcoded secrets, known-vulnerable imports, and deprecated API calls can be flagged in the IDE before a developer pushes a commit. Catching them at authoring time means fewer findings blocking the MR, so review cycles go to the findings that require cross-component context: reachability, exploitability, and architectural risk.\n\n**Triage automated by default, not by exception.** Embedding security into every merge request creates a volume problem. More scans, more findings, more noise reaching developers who aren’t trained to distinguish a reachable critical from a theoretical one. AI must handle false positive detection, reachability, exploitability context, and severity assessment before a developer sees the finding, so the findings they see actually warrant their time.\n\n**Remediation governed like any other change.** AI-based remediation compresses the timeline for closing vulnerabilities, but every generated fix must move through the same governance as a human-authored change: policies enforce scans, the right reviewers approve, and evidence is recorded. GitLab’s automated remediation capability proposes each fix in a merge request with a confidence score. The MR records which policy applied, which scans ran, what they found, and who approved. Human code and AI-generated code move through the same process, with the same audit trail.\n\n## What a ready pipeline looks like\n\nHere's how these pieces work together when a high-severity vulnerability is discovered and the clock is running.\n\nA proof-of-concept exploit for a vulnerability in a popular open-source package appears on a security mailing list. There’s no CVE, no National Vulnerability Database (NVD) entry, and no scanner signature yet. The security team finds out the usual way: someone shares it in Slack.\n\nA security engineer asks the security agent if the package is in use, which projects have affected versions, and whether any vulnerable call paths are reachable in production. The agent checks the dependency graph for every project, matches the affected versions and entry points from the disclosure, and returns a ranked list of exposed projects with details about reachability. There’s no need to search through repositories by hand or wait for a scanner update. The question, \"Are we exposed?\" is answered in minutes.\n\nThe engineer starts a remediation campaign for every exposed project. The remediation agent suggests fixes: version updates where a patched release is available, and targeted call-path patches where it is not. Scan execution policies are already in place for projects tagged SOC 2. The engineer hardens the rules to block merges on any merge request that introduces or keeps the affected dependency, and an approval policy now requires security sign-off on every fix. The agent's first proposed patch fails the pipeline when an integration test catches a regression. The agent revises the patch based on the test failure, and the second attempt passes. Developers review the changes, security signs off under the stricter policy, and merges proceed across the campaign.\n\nAt the next audit review, the security team presents a report showing how policies were enforced and risks were reduced during the campaign. It includes scan results, policies applied, approvers, and merge timestamps for every MR in every affected project. The evidence was automatically generated in flight, not assembled after the fact.\n\n## Close the gaps now\n\nMythos exists today, and comparable models will be in attacker hands within a year. Every month between now and then is a chance to strengthen your software supply chain.\n\nAsk these questions about your pipeline:\n\n* How do you enforce that security scans run on every merge request, not just the projects where teams configured them?\n\n* If a compromised package entered your dependency tree today, would your pipeline catch it before build?\n\n* When a scanner flags a critical finding, how many tool boundaries does it cross before a developer starts the fix?\n\n* If an AI agent proposed a code fix for a vulnerability, what process would that fix go through before reaching production, and is that process auditable?\n\n* When auditors ask for evidence that a specific policy was enforced on a specific change, how long does it take to produce?\n\nIf the answers expose gaps, address them now. [Talk to a GitLab solutions architect](https://about.gitlab.com/sales/) about the role of security governance in your development lifecycle.",[720,9,529],"AI/ML","https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1772195014/ooezwusxjl1f7ijfmbvj.png",{"featured":25,"template":13,"slug":723},"prepare-your-pipeline-for-ai-discovered-zero-days",{"content":725,"config":737},{"title":726,"description":727,"authors":728,"heroImage":730,"date":731,"category":9,"tags":732,"body":736},"Manage vulnerability noise at scale with auto-dismiss policies","Learn how to cut through scanner noise and focus on the vulnerabilities that matter most with GitLab security, including use cases and templates.",[729],"Grant Hickman","https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1774375772/kpaaaiqhokevxxeoxvu0.png","2026-03-25",[9,733,561,734,735],"tutorial","features","product","Security scanners are essential, but not every finding requires action. Test code, vendored dependencies, generated files, and known false positives create noise that buries the vulnerabilities that actually matter. Security teams waste hours manually dismissing the same irrelevant findings across projects and pipelines. They experience slower triage, alert fatigue, and developer friction that undermines adoption of security scanning itself.\n\nGitLab's auto-dismiss vulnerability policies let you codify your triage decisions once and apply them automatically on every default-branch pipeline. Define criteria based on file path, directory, or vulnerability identifier (CVE, CWE), choose a dismissal reason, and let GitLab handle the rest.\n\n## Why auto-dismiss?\nAuto-dismiss vulnerability policies enable security teams to:\n- **Eliminate triage noise**: Automatically dismiss findings in test code, vendored dependencies, and generated files.\n- **Enforce decisions at scale**: Apply policies centrally to dismiss known false positives across your entire organization.\n- **Maintain audit transparency**: Every auto-dismissed finding includes a documented reason and links back to the policy that triggered it.\n- **Preserve the record**: Unlike scanner exclusions, dismissed vulnerabilities remain in your report, so you can revisit decisions if conditions change.\n\n## How auto-dismiss policies work\n\n1. **Define your policy** in a vulnerability management policy YAML file. Specify match criteria (file path, directory, or identifier) and a dismissal reason.\n\n2. **Merge and activate.** Create the policy via **Secure > Policies > New  policy > Vulnerability management policy**. Merge the MR to enable it.\n3. **Run your pipeline.** On every default-branch pipeline, matching vulnerabilities are automatically set to \"Dismissed\" with the specified reason. Up to 1,000 vulnerabilities are processed per run.\n4. **Measure the impact.** Filter your vulnerability report by status \"Dismissed\" to see exactly what was cleaned up and validate that the right findings are being handled.\n\n## Use cases with ready-to-use configurations\n\nEach example below includes a policy configuration you can copy, customize, and apply immediately.\n\n### 1. Dismiss test code vulnerabilities\n\nSAST and dependency scanners flag hardcoded credentials, insecure fixtures, and dev-only dependencies in test directories. These are not production risks.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Dismiss test code vulnerabilities\"\n    description: \"Auto-dismiss findings in test directories\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: file_path\n            value: \"test/**/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: file_path\n            value: \"tests/**/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: file_path\n            value: \"spec/**/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: directory\n            value: \"__tests__/*\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: used_in_tests\n\n```\n\n### 2. Dismiss vendored and third-party code\n\nVulnerabilities in `vendor/`, `third_party/`, or checked-in `node_modules` are managed upstream and not actionable for your team.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Dismiss vendored dependency findings\"\n    description: \"Findings in vendored code are managed upstream\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: directory\n            value: \"vendor/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: directory\n            value: \"third_party/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: directory\n            value: \"vendored/*\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: not_applicable\n\n```\n\n### 3. Dismiss known false positive CVEs\n\nCertain CVEs are repeatedly flagged but don't apply to your usage context. Teams dismiss these manually every time they appear. Replace the example CVEs below with your own.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Dismiss known false positive CVEs\"\n    description: \"CVEs confirmed as false positives for our environment\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CVE-2023-44487\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CVE-2024-29041\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CVE-2023-26136\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: false_positive\n\n```\n\n### 4. Dismiss generated and auto-created code\n\nProtobuf, gRPC, OpenAPI generators, and ORM scaffolding tools produce files with flagged patterns that cannot be patched by your team.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Dismiss generated code findings\"\n    description: \"Generated files are not authored by us\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: directory\n            value: \"generated/*\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: file_path\n            value: \"**/*.pb.go\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: file_path\n            value: \"**/*.generated.*\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: not_applicable\n\n```\n\n### 5. Dismiss infrastructure-mitigated vulnerabilities\n\nVulnerability classes like XSS (CWE-79) or SQL injection (CWE-89) that are already addressed by WAF rules or runtime protection. Only use this when mitigating controls are verified and consistently enforced.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Dismiss CWEs mitigated by WAF\"\n    description: \"XSS and SQLi mitigated by WAF rules\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CWE-79\"\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CWE-89\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: mitigating_control\n\n```\n\n### 6. Dismiss CVE families across your organization\n\nA wave of related CVEs for a widely-used library your team has assessed? Apply at the group level to dismiss them across dozens of projects. The wildcard pattern (e.g., `CVE-2021-44*`) matches all CVEs with that prefix.\n\n```yaml\nvulnerability_management_policy:\n  - name: \"Accept risk for log4j CVE family\"\n    description: \"Log4j CVEs mitigated by version pinning and WAF\"\n    enabled: true\n    rules:\n      - type: detected\n        criteria:\n          - type: identifier\n            value: \"CVE-2021-44*\"\n    actions:\n      - type: auto_dismiss\n        dismissal_reason: acceptable_risk\n\n```\n\n## Quick reference\n\n| Parameter | Details |\n|-----------|---------|\n| **Criteria types** | `file_path` (glob patterns, e.g., `test/**/*`), `directory` (e.g., `vendor/*`), `identifier` (CVE/CWE with wildcards, e.g., `CVE-2023-*`) |\n| **Dismissal reasons** | `acceptable_risk`, `false_positive`, `mitigating_control`, `used_in_tests`, `not_applicable` |\n| **Criteria logic** | Multiple criteria within a rule = AND (must match all). Multiple rules within a policy = OR (match any). |\n| **Limits** | 3 criteria per rule, 5 rules per policy, 5 policies per security policy project. Vulnerabilty management policy actions process 1000 vulnerabilities per pipeline run in the target project, until all matching vulnerabilities are processed. |\n| **Affected statuses** | Needs triage, Confirmed |\n| **Scope** | Project-level or group-level (group-level applies across all projects) |\n\n## Getting started\nHere's how to get started with auto-dismiss policies:\n\n1. **Identify the noise.** Open your vulnerability report and sort by \"Needs triage.\" Look for patterns: test files, vendored code, the same CVE across projects.\n\n2. **Pick a scenario.** Start with whichever use case above accounts for the most findings.\n\n3. **Record your baseline.** Note the number of \"Needs triage\" vulnerabilities before creating a policy.\n\n4. **Create and enable.** Navigate to **Secure > Policies > New policy > Vulnerability management policy**. Paste the configuration from the use case above, then merge the MR.\n\n5. **Validate results.** After the next default-branch pipeline, filter by status \"Dismissed\" to confirm the right findings were handled.\n\nFor full configuration details, see the [vulnerability management policy documentation](https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/policies/vulnerability_management_policy/#auto-dismiss-policies).\n\n> Ready to take control of vulnerability noise? [Start a free GitLab Ultimate trial](https://about.gitlab.com/free-trial/) and configure your first auto-dismiss policy today.\n",{"slug":738,"featured":25,"template":13},"auto-dismiss-vulnerability-management-policy",{"content":740,"config":749},{"title":741,"description":742,"authors":743,"heroImage":745,"date":746,"body":747,"category":9,"tags":748},"GitLab 18.10 brings AI-native triage and remediation ","Learn about GitLab Duo Agent Platform capabilities that cut noise, surface real vulnerabilities, and turn findings into proposed fixes.",[744],"Alisa Ho","https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1773843921/rm35fx4gylrsu9alf2fx.png","2026-03-19","GitLab 18.10 introduces new AI-powered security capabilities focused on improving the quality and speed of vulnerability management. Together, these features can help reduce the time developers spend investigating false positives and bring automated remediation directly into their workflow, so they can fix vulnerabilities without needing to be security experts.\n\nHere is what’s new:\n\n* [**Static Application Security Testing (SAST) false positive detection**](https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/vulnerabilities/false_positive_detection/) **is now generally available.** This flow uses an LLM for agentic reasoning to determine the likelihood that a vulnerability is a false positive or not, so security and development teams can focus on remediating critical vulnerabilities first.  \n* [**Agentic SAST vulnerability resolution**](https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/vulnerabilities/agentic_vulnerability_resolution/) **is now in beta.** Agentic SAST vulnerability resolution automatically creates a merge request with a proposed fix for verified SAST vulnerabilities, which can shorten time to remediation and reduce the need for deep security expertise.  \n* [**Secret false positive detection**](https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/vulnerabilities/secret_false_positive_detection/) **is now in beta.** This flow brings the same AI-powered noise reduction to secret detection, flagging dummy and test secrets to save review effort.\n\nThese flows are available to GitLab Ultimate customers using GitLab Duo Agent Platform. \n\n## Cut triage time with SAST false positive detection\n\nTraditional SAST scanners flag every suspicious code pattern they find, regardless of whether code paths are reachable or frameworks already handle the risk. Without runtime context, they cannot distinguish a real vulnerability from safe code that just looks dangerous.\n\nThis means developers could spend hours investigating findings that turn out to be false positives. Over time, that can erode confidence in the report and slow down the teams responsible for fixing real risks.\n\nAfter each SAST scan, GitLab Duo Agent Platform automatically analyzes new critical and high severity findings and attaches:\n\n* A confidence score indicating how likely the finding is to be a false positive  \n* An AI-generated explanation describing the reasoning  \n* A visual badge that makes “Likely false positive” versus “Likely real” easy to scan in the UI\n\nThese findings appear in the [Vulnerability Report](https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/vulnerability_report/), as shown below. You can filter the report to focus on findings marked as “Not false positive” so teams can spend their time addressing real vulnerabilities instead of sifting through noise.\n\n![Vulnerability report](https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1773844787/i0eod01p7gawflllkgsr.png)\n\n\nGitLab Duo Agent Platform's assessment is a recommendation. You stay in control of every false positive to determine if it is valid, and you can audit the agent's reasoning at any time to build confidence in the model. \n\n\n## Turn vulnerabilities into automated fixes\n\nKnowing that a vulnerability is real is only half the work.  Remediation still requires understanding the code path, writing a safe patch, and making sure nothing else breaks.\n\nIf the vulnerability is identified as likely not be a false positive by the SAST false positive detection flow, the Agentic SAST vulnerability resolution flow automatically:\n\n1. Reads the vulnerable code and surrounding context from your repository  \n2. Generates high-quality proposed fixes  \n3. Validates fixes through automated testing   \n4. Opens a merge request with a proposed fix that includes:  \n   * Concrete code changes  \n   * A confidence score  \n   * An explanation of what changed and why\n\nIn this demo, you’ll see how GitLab can automatically take a SAST vulnerability all the way from detection to a ready-to-review merge request. Watch how the agent reads the code, generates and validates a fix, and opens an MR with clear, explainable changes so developers can remediate faster without being security experts.\n\n\u003Ciframe src=\"https://player.vimeo.com/video/1174573325?badge=0&autopause=0&player_id=0&app_id=58479\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"autoplay; fullscreen; picture-in-picture; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;\" title=\"GitLab 18.10 AI SAST False Positive Auto Remediation\">\u003C/iframe>\u003Cscript src=\"https://player.vimeo.com/api/player.js\">\u003C/script>\n\nAs with any AI-generated suggestion, you should review the proposed merge request carefully before merging.\n\n## Surface real secrets\n\nSecret detection is only useful if teams trust the results. When reports are full of test credentials, placeholder values, and example tokens, developers may waste time reviewing noise instead of fixing real exposures. That can slow remediation and decrease confidence in the scan.\n\nSecret false positive detection helps teams focus on the secrets that matter so they can reduce risk faster. When it runs on the default branch, it will automatically:\n\n1. Analyze each finding to spot likely test credentials, example values, and dummy secrets  \n2. Assign a confidence score for whether the finding is a real risk or a likely false positive  \n3. Generate an explanation for why the secret is being treated as real or noise  \n4. Add a badge in the Vulnerability Report so developers can see the status at a glance\n\nDevelopers can also trigger this analysis manually from the Vulnerability Report by selecting **“Check for false positive”** on any secret detection finding, helping them clear out findings that do not pose risk and focus on real secrets sooner.\n\n## Try AI-powered security today\n\nGitLab 18.10 introduces capabilities that cover the full vulnerability workflow, from cutting false positive noise in SAST and secret detection to automatically generating merge requests with proposed fixes.\n\nTo see how AI-powered security can help cut review time and turn findings into ready-to-merge fixes, [start a free trial of GitLab Duo Agent Platform today](https://about.gitlab.com/gitlab-duo-agent-platform/?utm_medium=blog&utm_source=blog&utm_campaign=eg_global_x_x_security_en_).",[735,9,734],{"featured":12,"template":13,"slug":750},"gitlab-18-10-brings-ai-native-triage-and-remediation",{"promotions":752},[753,767,778,789],{"id":754,"categories":755,"header":757,"text":758,"button":759,"image":764},"ai-modernization",[756],"ai-ml","Is AI achieving its promise at scale?","Quiz will take 5 minutes or less",{"text":760,"config":761},"Get your AI maturity score",{"href":762,"dataGaName":763,"dataGaLocation":238},"/assessments/ai-modernization-assessment/","modernization assessment",{"config":765},{"src":766},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1772138786/qix0m7kwnd8x2fh1zq49.png",{"id":768,"categories":769,"header":770,"text":758,"button":771,"image":775},"devops-modernization",[735,564],"Are you just managing tools or shipping innovation?",{"text":772,"config":773},"Get your DevOps maturity score",{"href":774,"dataGaName":763,"dataGaLocation":238},"/assessments/devops-modernization-assessment/",{"config":776},{"src":777},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1772138785/eg818fmakweyuznttgid.png",{"id":779,"categories":780,"header":781,"text":758,"button":782,"image":786},"security-modernization",[9],"Are you trading speed for security?",{"text":783,"config":784},"Get your security maturity score",{"href":785,"dataGaName":763,"dataGaLocation":238},"/assessments/security-modernization-assessment/",{"config":787},{"src":788},"https://res.cloudinary.com/about-gitlab-com/image/upload/v1772138786/p4pbqd9nnjejg5ds6mdk.png",{"id":790,"paths":791,"header":794,"text":795,"button":796,"image":801},"github-azure-migration",[792,793],"migration-from-azure-devops-to-gitlab","integrating-azure-devops-scm-and-gitlab","Is your team ready for GitHub's Azure move?","GitHub is already rebuilding around Azure. Find out what it means for you.",{"text":797,"config":798},"See how GitLab compares to GitHub",{"href":799,"dataGaName":800,"dataGaLocation":238},"/compare/gitlab-vs-github/github-azure-migration/","github azure migration",{"config":802},{"src":777},{"header":804,"blurb":805,"button":806,"secondaryButton":811},"Start building faster today","See what your team can do with the intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps.\n",{"text":807,"config":808},"Get your free trial",{"href":809,"dataGaName":45,"dataGaLocation":810},"https://gitlab.com/-/trial_registrations/new?glm_content=default-saas-trial&glm_source=about.gitlab.com/","feature",{"text":500,"config":812},{"href":49,"dataGaName":50,"dataGaLocation":810},1777302610591]